Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wait, why do I care what some guy with a journalism degree and zero relevant academic qualifications thinks about a subject he doesn't know anything about?
Zero qualifications? Nope. He was an accepted and award-winning member of the AMS.
Isn't this really, really old news? John Coleman has been denying climate change for the past 10 years, if not longer. I think more than a few of the people who work at the Weather Channel would disagree with him.
Let me pull a page from your book:
You are not a scientist, he is and not only is he a educated scientist, but he is a founder of one of the main weather sources in the world.
So, who are you to even question him? Isn't that what you folks say? Appeals to authority? You have the audacity to call him a denier when your education isn't even worth licking the boots of him? Go ahead, spin your way out of that one, and remember... you are the one who promotes "appeals to authority" and uses politically charged words like "denier" to spread your hate.
It's sad that climate change deniers latch on to any flake to ignore the immense environmental threat facing our planet, while belittling real scientists.
Climate change deniers never talk about the impacts to the oceans, where a huge portion of the human protein supply is at risk. Ocean warming and acidification are measured, empirical facts.
Climate is not the same thing as weather. There's a reason why climatology and meteorology are different, yet related disciplines. Not like he's actually studied either one, his degree is in media studies and he hasn't published anything related to the climate.
It's sad that climate change deniers latch on to any flake to ignore the immense environmental threat facing our environment, while belittling real scientists.
Climate change deniers never talk about the impacts to the oceans, where a huge portion of the human protein supply is at risk. Ocean warming and acidification are measured, empirical facts.
Climate is not the same thing as weather. There's a reason why climatology and meteorology are different, yet related disciplines. Not like he's actually studied either one, his degree is in media studies and he hasn't published anything related to the climate.
Climate is not weather is a political talking point.
so apparently scientists who recognize the fact that the earth heats and cools periodically, and does so naturally, are not scientists but hacks to the alarmists, but only because they go against what the alarmists believe.
also one thing i have never understood, if we properly break down the word "meteorology" it is the study of meteors. and what is a meteor? it is a rock floating in space. so how does studying a rock floating in space let us know what the weather on this planet is going to be? and then we wonder why weather reporters can never truly predict the weather.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm keeping a copy of the video. Old dude tells it like it is! 
blasphemer!
Opinion of real scientists
