Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Say we had very intelligent AI and you could program it with all of the knowledge a Judge knows, BUT you would still have a fully human jury, would you feel that would be okay? So say, the jury still gets to decide whether innocent or guilty, but the Robot Judge gets to decide the sentence. I would be for it. As it is Judges, I believe, that despite not supposed to be, are VERY biased. Women for example, are consistently given MUCH lighter sentences then men for the same crime. And in a few cases even men that rape women are given very light sentences. Among other things. I, for one, don't trust Judges at all to be impartial or fair. You may joke about this seeming crazy, but would it really be, if you were to program it with all the knowledge of whatever a Judge is supposed to have and pass the sentence based not by any emotion or any other human infallibility, but straight logic and reasoning?
Say we had very intelligent AI and you could program it with all of the knowledge a Judge knows,
No. By the time an AI is smart enough to understand the nuances of a trial, it will be smart enough to corrupt.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Would you be okay with Robots being judges?
