are liberals saying that if there is no Russian interference in the next elections, that they will win? (CNN, Clinton)

[dashrendar4454]

that the GOP needed Russians to help them win?

[Fiyero]

They needed the Russians to help Trump win, but Republicans have been cheating for years so they will cheat again.

And you can't deny that since the courts have been calling them out on their cheating in numerous states.

[TristramShandy]

I'm not. There are enough avenues to dupe easily suggestible Americans into voting Trump that Russia isn't needed.

[Mike930]

Originally Posted by Fiyero

They needed the Russians to help Trump win, but Republicans have been cheating for years so they will cheat again.

And you can't deny that since the courts have been calling them out on their cheating in numerous states.

I wasn't aware that Hillary was a Republican.

[Finn_Jarber]

are liberals saying that if there is no Russian interference in the next elections, that they will win?

I don't know. Are they?

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by dashrendar4454

that the GOP needed Russians to help them win?

The Federal Government is using this to take back the narrative and highly restrict the internet.

Sweeping all alternative news sources off the web, while censoring anything government doesn't want the public to know.
Remember before the internet, the FCC held an iron fist on what the public heard. They want it back, so they can control and herd us like sheepe again.

[sonnymarkjiz]

Haha well, if the DNC isn't corrupt and the "Russians " don't expose the DNC again, they should be fine.

But....the DNC got exposed.

Here's a hint, DNC. Don't try to cheat....and you just might win!

[RedZin]

Originally Posted by BentBow

The Federal Government is using this to take back the narrative and highly restrict the internet.

Sweeping all alternative news sources off the web, while cencoring anything government doesn't want the public to know.
Remember before the internet, the FCC held an iron fist on what the public heard. They want it back, so they can control and herd us like sheepe again.

What in the world are you talking about?

The Trump Admin has been busy trying to wipe out net neutrality, for crying out loud.

Do you know what that means?

Hint: The Obama Admin protected it.

So, do with that what you like.

[RedZin]

Originally Posted by sonnymarkjiz

Haha well, if the DNC isn't corrupt and the "Russians " don't expose the DNC again, they should be fine.

But....the DNC got exposed.

Here's a hint, DNC. Don't try to cheat....and you just might win!

I know that the press from Wikileaks was bad for the DNC, but did they actually CHEAT?

Preferring Clinton (a lifelong Democrat) over Sanders (who really just signed up for the money) was hardly an evil thing.

I dunno... I think this has more to do with leaks and less to do with genuine cheating.

After all, Sanders didn't win the nomination and nobody actually cheated the primaries at all.

[sonnymarkjiz]

Originally Posted by RedZin

I know that the press from Wikileaks was bad for the DNC, but did they actually CHEAT?

Preferring Clinton (a lifelong Democrat) over Sanders (who really just signed up for the money) was hardly an evil thing.

I dunno... I think this has more to do with leaks and less to do with genuine cheating.

After all, Sanders didn't win the nomination and nobody actually cheated the primaries at all.

Yes! The Bernie Sanders thing was exposed, like Wasserman Schultz smearing him as an atheist and other things, as well as Donna Brazille (sp) from CNN feeding Hillary the questions for the debate...to me..that's cheating, especially the debate questions thing.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37639370

When that got exposed, it turned voters off.

If they just played fair, Hillary might be President today. But Bernie was super popular and Hillary felt she needed the Presidency handed to her.

Their own corruption screwed them, not Russia.