The same discouraging misogyny tradition toward Hillary (Putin, Iran, middle east)

[GHOSTRIDER AZ]

Originally Posted by shadowne

How long before you people let it go?

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...obsessing.html

Its not obsessing. The Clinton Machine is equal to the Cartel in the way they have been operating.


Bill Hill should been prosecuted years ago. Bill Clinton should of been removed from Office.

[MPowering1]

Originally Posted by Clarallel

I think women are always going to be more aware of this than men are.

There's a lengthy look at post-election Hillary which I know would interest some of you, and there's the perfect classic situation:

A competent woman losing a job to an incompetent man



The surreal post-election life of the woman who would have been president
By Rebecca Traister
Inside Hillary Clinton

That's a great way to avoid looking at why she was damaged goods for anyone who isn't party or gender loyal.

This is exactly the kind of thinking I fear the Democrats will still have in the next election, which means they'll once again lose.

[shadowne]

Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ

Its not obsessing. The Clinton Machine is equal to the Cartel in the way they have been operating.


Bill Hill should been prosecuted years ago. Bill Clinton should of been removed from Office.

I was just pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.

[petch751]

Originally Posted by Clarallel

I think women are always going to be more aware of this than men are.

There's a lengthy look at post-election Hillary which I know would interest some of you, and there's the perfect classic situation:

A competent woman losing a job to an incompetent man



The surreal post-election life of the woman who would have been president
By Rebecca Traister
Inside Hillary Clinton

Competitent at what? It sure isn't national security. Maybe competent in her corruption and taking advantage of the American tax payer.... Signed, an American women who doesn't want a corrupt woman representing American women and certainly wouldn't vote for Hillary just because she's a women (to do so is nonsense and stupidity).

[dashrendar4454]

Originally Posted by don1945

I am never surprised when men treat women as second class citizens, but what really surprises me is when women treat other women in the same way. During this election, you would have thought a lot of women would have stood up for Hillary, if for no other reason than she was going further than any other woman in history, but we saw a lot of women who turned their back on her.

I am not saying they should support her simply because of her sex, but those same women, who "didn't like Hillary", voted for a man who has a proven history of treating women like dogs and sex toys. I can understand men thinking that his mentality is ok, but women generally are pretty good at sniffing out jerks. But somehow they chose a man with very low morals and ideals, over a woman who may have had some flaws, but who has fought for women and children all her life.

I've always seen this mentality put forward and don't get it. Why should a woman defend another woman just because they are both women? Do all women share some kind of kinship? Why do liberals think this?

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by Clarallel

I think women are always going to be more aware of this than men are.

There's a lengthy look at post-election Hillary which I know would interest some of you, and there's the perfect classic situation:

A competent woman losing a job to an incompetent man



The surreal post-election life of the woman who would have been president
By Rebecca Traister
Inside Hillary Clinton

I voted for a competent woman. Jill Stein.

[BigCityDreamer]

Originally Posted by pknopp

I voted for a competent woman. Jill Stein.

Jill who?

LOL

[Toyman at Jewel Lake]

"Misogyny"-the new "race card" for when you are losing an argument and can't make an intelligent point.

Funny how all those that attacked Sarah Palin never accepted the same label.

[dashrendar4454]

Trump is the one that earned the presidency. Not Hillary



Hillary didn't work hard enough.

Trump campaigned 50% more than she did in the states he needed most to win.

She didn't go to Wisconsin at all - he went there 6 times and won it.

[functionofx]

Originally Posted by Clarallel

The same discouraging misogyny tradition toward Hillary

Could it be possible, some voters in swing states, took a look at two flawed candidates and decided Hillary was worse?