Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Like I said anyone who thinks they wont know is naïve......actually the more I think about it, anyone who thinks they wont know is just plain stupid lol.
There will be an official notification or an unofficial one..........but either way they will know.
You know you've lost an argument when you resort to name calling just like your friend above.
All the good ones turned him down. The one he has went to Trump U, School of Law.
LOL!!!! You obviously don't know who Jay Sekulow is. He is among the BEST Constitutional lawyers you could find. Most of his cases are Supreme Court cases, and he has a track record of success.
He serves on the faculty of Regent University School of Law as a Distinguished Professor of Law. He teaches courses in Supreme Court history and constitutional law.
Jay received his doctor of jurisprudence from Mercer Law School, graduating in the top 5% of his class. He earned a PhD from Regent University.
Now, give us your sources for your claim, "the good ones turned him down." Go!
Sorry, there's no other word to describe that level of ignorance about how things work in Washington.
Well I always feel that a discussion is best had without all the name calling, but your President leads the way on that so I guess I should expect nothing less.
Anyway you seem to have sidetracked the discussion.
Your supposition that the President would be informed if he was being investigated is pure speculation on your part. Why don't you wait and see how things play out before you assume such things?
The FBI and federal prosecutors, do not routinely notify people that are the subject of investigation, that they are under investigation, so your assumption that people who believe otherwise are 'stupid' reflects badly on yourself.
Why don't we come back to this thread when we know what the facts are?
Ahh, resorting to name calling. Just like your great leader.
Oh, is saying "stupid Liberals" now classed as "name calling?"
How about Hillary's comment "Trump's basket of deplorables." I guess you forgot that. Of course the infamous Obama and "bitter clingers" comment. Forgot that too, huh?
At which lawyer did you reach the definitive conclusion that Trump himself was under investigation.......number 6, 9, 13? Just curious.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
