Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is killing a Muslim a hate crime?
Yes 15 16.30%
No 19 20.65%
Depends on the motive 54 58.70%
No if done by an illegal Mexican immigrant to the United States 4 4.35%
Voters: 92. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2017, 02:26 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,794 posts, read 2,796,788 times
Reputation: 4920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
The left says we must support the illegal immigrants and Muslims too.
There is no reason to be alarmed if one kills the other.
Its all perfectly acceptable and no reason to start enforcing the law now.
Nah, that's not it. Immigration is irrelevant to the murder that apparently took place. The dead woman wasn't particularly religious (per the coverage I've seen), so it might be a stretch to call her Muslim.

Murder isn't acceptable, I don't care what ideological blinkers we have, the first rule of a society is that we must be reasonably secure in our person.

It will take a trial to sort out what happened. If the accused did bludgeon this woman to death, I expect him to be sentenced & serve out his time (if it's not a capital case - depends on the facts that surface in the trial).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2017, 02:47 PM
 
4,491 posts, read 2,224,014 times
Reputation: 1992
Did you kill one becasue they were about to stab you in the face? Or did you kill one because you feel their religion is inferior?

It kind of depends on the circumstances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,232,433 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCityTheBridge View Post
Thoughts alone are never a crime. But every crime requires a mental state and an act and they must be simultaneous.
Of course every crime involves a mental state. Your comment is vacuous. Explain why certain mental states should require extra punishment while others don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,232,433 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
Well... no, not really. The thoughts are not being penalized. It is the action that is penalized more harshly because, when motivated by bias toward a group, it has a greater negative impact on society.


Hate crime laws are legitimate in theory. But of course in practice they are not applied fairly, and wind up causing more injustice than they remedy.
Actually, yes. Motivation can be punished with extra jail time. That is penalizing certain thoughts.

However, I do agree that things like racism, etc... that can motivate someone is damaging to society. No question. But so are lots of other things that we don't penalize.

I also agree that hate crime laws are often applied unfairly. That's actually an excellent point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 04:04 PM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,518,626 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
Of course every crime involves a mental state. Your comment is vacuous. Explain why certain mental states should require extra punishment while others don't.
Because, in the wisdom of past judges and present Legislators, those mental states are deserving of greater condemnation--whether for deterrent purposes or for mustering a punishment that meets the criminal misdeed.

For example, we (collectively) assign more criminal responsibility to someone who plots and carries out a killing than someone who kills by accident. You can justify the different levels of responsibility by the need for greater/lesser deterrent. Or you can justify the different levels of responsibility on the basis of greater/lesser moral approbation for the criminal's conduct. As the common law developed, moral approbation was the greater driver. It still reigns supreme as the justification for criminal punishment. Drunk driving is a perfect example.

The same conduct creates dramatically different punishment depending purely on the consequences of the act.

If you get in a car and drive drunk, you'll face a pretty minor punishment for a first offense. If you get in a car and drive drunk and get in an accident where no one is hurt, you'll get a more significant punishment. If you get in a car and drive drunk and get in an accident killing someone, you'll face a severe punishment.

If deterrence were the main justification of punishment, then we would more harshly punish any drunk driving offense, knowing the risks it poses.

Plenty of people in this thread seem to think that hate alone is a crime. It is not. My comment was not vacuous because people clearly do not understand what a hate crime is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 04:05 PM
 
212 posts, read 135,971 times
Reputation: 350
Mexican illegal invaders are a protected class amongst liberals, especially since Trump was elected.

Last edited by CaseyB; 06-20-2017 at 07:57 PM.. Reason: flaming
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2017, 09:08 AM
 
3,532 posts, read 3,017,652 times
Reputation: 6324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
The question is: WHY?

Do you not understand that adding jail time for motive is effectively criminalizing certain thoughts?

Do you like the idea of thought crimes? Because that's what this is really about.
Conspiracy is technically a thought crime
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2017, 11:46 AM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,518,626 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by hellob View Post
Conspiracy is technically a thought crime
It is not. You must have a conspiratorial act to be convicted of conspiracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top