Now they are suing Ivanka over shoes. (Simpson, speech, 2014)

[CBeisbol]

Originally Posted by latimeria

I'd call that post the fail.

Six pages of Left vs Right bickering. I'm sure the OP considers that a win

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by JasonF

Are you unaware of design patents? They're commonly used in the fashion industry, particularly for things like shoes and jewelry.

Fabric patterns are covered under copyright law, as was settled 87 years ago.

Yes I am unaware as there are constantly fashion knock offs.

I see you didn't site any law.

But whatever the courts will settle it.

Originally Posted by Blondy

Yes I am unaware as there are constantly fashion knock offs.

I see you didn't site any law.

But whatever the courts will settle it.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/271

And the word you're looking for is cite.

And yes, the courts will sort it out. Their latest effort in sorting it out is telling Ivanka that it doesn't matter how special she thinks she is, she still has to give a deposition.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by Donna-501

You might recall her shoe line was slapped with a trademark lawsuit by Italian luxury brand Aquazzura back in June for allegedly copying its designs.

Not the point. Please quote the law.

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by JasonF

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/271

And the word you're looking for is cite.

And yes, the courts will sort it out. Their latest effort in sorting it out is telling Ivanka that it doesn't matter how special she thinks she is, she still has to give a deposition.

yes you are correct with cite.

Thanks for being petty.

[moneill]

A small point, but this Italian company had accused Ivanka Trump of copying a design before and Ivanka's company pulled the shoe in question. to me this demonstrates a previous inclination to copy & hope they don't get caught.

[jacqueg]

I don't care about the shoes one way or the other. No matter who designed them, they are ugly and clearly torture devices for totally innocent feet.

What I think is bizarre is that the OP has apparently concluded that an Italian shoe company is controlled by American leftists. Personally, I would love to see the chain of reasoning, step by step, that underlies this conclusion. Because I am sure it is fascinating.

[i_love_autumn]

Originally Posted by don1945

Lefties...........Italians, no difference. Anyone who would dare sue them is horrible, according to Trumpees.

So, what is the big deal ? Her Papa gets sued all the time, and has for years. It is simply "Being a smart business person !"

The acorn didn't fall too far from the tree, did it ?

Yeah, he's so smart that's why he ends up losing so many lawsuits, the latest was his bogus Trump University and he had to pay $25 million to those he defrauded!


I hope miss greedy-guts has to pay through the nose!

[i_love_autumn]

Originally Posted by greywar

To be specific they are suing her over copying their designs. Being Ivanka doesn't make you immune to that sort of thing.

Heres a link with pictures that demonstrates that yes, they have a case, and its justified.

Shame on OP for:
1. not providing a link
2. attempting to defend this obvious case

Ivanka Trump Responds Predictably To Aquazzura's Shoe-Copying Lawsuit | HuffPost

It's absolutely justified, the photos prove their case! So Ivanka is a thief and a liar just like Daddy, no surprise, they are nothing more than a mob family, just nowhere near as smart!

[RMESMH]

Originally Posted by i_love_autumn

Yeah, he's so smart that's why he ends up losing so many lawsuits, the latest was his bogus Trump University and he had to pay $25 million to those he defrauded!

^^^^^ Some might say it is a distinction without a difference, but the above ^^^^^ shows how poorly you pay attention to details. He didn't lose at trial. He didn't have a judgement decided against him for $25 million, or any other amount. He SETTLED (paid) BEFORE the lawsuit could go to trial.