Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2017, 08:59 PM
 
17,342 posts, read 11,274,075 times
Reputation: 40962

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
They are about to win the culture war. I think within the next ten years we will see the following changes.

1) Marriage equality overturned
2) Roe v Wade overturned
3) Establishment clause only applies to federal government, so Oklahoma for instance could become a Baptist state, Utah could become a Mormon state, etc.
4) Prayer returned to schools, likely dependent on whatever faith the state chose as the state religion
5) Lawrence vs Texas overturned (homosexuality recriminalized), Russia-style anti-gay law will be passed soon after
6) Non-discrimination laws pertaining to race and gender overturned
Nice fear mongering attempt but total failure. It's almost unheard of for a Supreme Court to back track another Supreme Courts decision on a major issue. Very few have happened.
Boy, you're really way out there, I have to hand that much to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Eugene, Oregon
11,119 posts, read 5,587,588 times
Reputation: 16596
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Trumps selection could really change the direction of the court.

What are the chances that any more picks Trump might make for the Supreme Court, will turn out to be sycophants, who will bow and wag their tails, as they carry-out his orders? Justice Kennedy himself, was picked to be another conservative member, but he turned out to be conscientious and mostly bi-partisan in his decisions and arguments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:06 PM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,056,322 times
Reputation: 17198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
What are the chances that any more picks Trump might make for the Supreme Court, will turn out to be sycophants, who will bow and wag their tails, as they carry-out his orders? Justice Kennedy himself, was picked to be another conservative member, but he turned out to be conscientious and mostly bi-partisan in his decisions and arguments.
Any newbies will be less left-wing vs the 80 somethings likely to depart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:12 PM
 
17,342 posts, read 11,274,075 times
Reputation: 40962
It happens. Reagan thought he was nominating a staunch conservative with O'Conner but she turned out to be very middle of the road and even leaned towards the liberal side on some issues. You just never know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:15 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,809,065 times
Reputation: 11338
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
It happens. Reagan thought he was nominating a staunch conservative with O'Conner but she turned out to be very middle of the road and even leaned towards the liberal side on some issues. You just never know.
That's the thing about it being a lifetime appointment. Once confirmed, they can vote their conscience. They don't have to have partisan loyalty because they will never be up for re-election. I always thought it was interesting how some of the justices conservatives hate the most, like Kennedy, were appointed by Republican Presidents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:16 PM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,056,322 times
Reputation: 17198
When, not if, these lefties leave, I want even more strict Constitutionalists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:18 PM
 
4,314 posts, read 3,995,499 times
Reputation: 7797
I'm confident any Supreme Court Judge Trump nominates will be far superior to anyone Hillary would have picked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Florida
10,453 posts, read 4,036,859 times
Reputation: 8469
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
If the rumor is true, then Trump will select a 2nd justice within the first 6 months of his Presidency.

Talk about a lost opportunity for the Democrats to have made radical change to the Supreme Court.

Elections do have consequences.

Supreme Court: Will Justice Kennedy retire this month? | Fox News


Trump still winning.

#MAGA
The only reason why I voted for Trump. To secure judges who will fight for the second amendment. Everything else Trump talked about, I really don't care about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:32 PM
 
17,342 posts, read 11,274,075 times
Reputation: 40962
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
That's the thing about it being a lifetime appointment. Once confirmed, they can vote their conscience. They don't have to have partisan loyalty because they will never be up for re-election. I always thought it was interesting how some of the justices conservatives hate the most, like Kennedy, were appointed by Republican Presidents.
Agreed, and that's why our Founding Fathers were smart enough to make them life long appointments. They can't be threatened with losing their jobs if they vote one way or another regardless of who appointed them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2017, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Florida
10,453 posts, read 4,036,859 times
Reputation: 8469
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
Agreed, and that's why our Founding Fathers were smart enough to make them life long appointments. They can't be threatened with losing their jobs if they vote one way or another regardless of who appointed them.
But can't they still be threatened if someone has high enough power to put a hit on a judge's family? Or the judge themselves?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top