Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-28-2017, 12:35 AM
 
3,564 posts, read 1,922,182 times
Reputation: 3732

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, they can do well, but at lower rates than everyone else. In the UW-Madison example I gave, there was about a 20% difference in 4-year graduation rates between Pell Grant students and the student body in general. Why spend taxpayer money to get inferior results? What sense does that make?
You're making the wrong comparison.

The comparison shouldn't be between students who received Pell Grants and those who didn't. It should be between students receiving Pell Grants and those same students if they did not receive Pell Grants.


It's like a investor deciding to invest. Does she make that decision based on the fact that she'll only make 80% as much as someone else? Or does she decide based on the fact that she'll make twice as much for herself than if she didn't?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-28-2017, 01:00 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,601,062 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
Government run education is like government run restaurants. You don't want to go there.
The average family can't afford private school
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 01:02 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by AfternoonCoffee View Post
Yeah, you're logic is definitely flawed.

It's senseless to think all those students belong to the same "group"

It's senseless to think taking away Pell Grants is going to improve outcomes.

It's senseless to not look at the big picture, and see that college educated people have far great earning potential over the course of their career, and that all Americans benefit from that. Pell Grants are a very small investment that pays off many times over.
A small investment?????

Are there things like Pell Grants for Truck Driving school or Plumbing School? Why not?

How's that Forestry degree working out?

"Almost half of all recent college graduates are working at jobs that don’t require a bachelor’s degree, according to a study from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

That same New York Fed study found that more and more recent college graduates are taking low-wage jobs and working part-time while fewer and fewer of them are working full-time at high-quality jobs.
"

"In fact, if they don’t have an advanced degree, graduates with a bachelor’s degree in psychology will likely be working as a human resources assistant, mental health technician or sales associate.

This analysis leads to a final reason why Sally can’t get a good job with her college degree.

She has the wrong degree.
"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 01:08 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,601,062 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
America did really well when there wasn't financial aid and only rich young gentlemen went to Harvard and Yale.

We were on the winning side in WW I and WW II.

It's been downhill ever since.
I think I threw up reading this
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 02:21 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeisbol View Post
You're making the wrong comparison.

The comparison shouldn't be between students who received Pell Grants and those who didn't. It should be between students receiving Pell Grants and those same students if they did not receive Pell Grants.
I disagree. My comparison is apt. Taxpayer money is being wasted on a group that gets inferior results.

We make the same mistake in K-12 public schools, as well. Some of the most highly-funded public school districts have the worst results. Camden, NJ, Washington, DC, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 06:24 AM
 
2,813 posts, read 2,113,241 times
Reputation: 6129
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, it isn't. Why spend taxpayer money on inferior results?

It's like taxpayers paying for 100% of a road to be built, but only 80% of the road ever gets completed.
No, it's not like that.

Do you except 100% of fires to be extinguished before someone dies, or else the fire department has achieved inferior results?

Do expect police officers to stop 100% of crime?

Do you expect 100% of American soldiers who fight in wars will return alive?

Taxpayer money is spent on these things, and things like Pell Grants, because society is better off with them than without them. We all benefit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 06:27 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by AfternoonCoffee View Post
No, it's not like that.
Yes, it is EXACTLY like that.

We know which group underperforms. Why do they get taxpayer funding while those who can achieve at a 20% higher rate, don't?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 06:31 AM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,305,403 times
Reputation: 16665
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, it is EXACTLY like that.

We know which group underperforms. Why do they get taxpayer funding while those who can achieve at a 20% higher rate, don't?
What is the college graduation rate of students who don't receive PELL grants?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 06:42 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
What is the college graduation rate of students who don't receive PELL grants?
I posted the example from UW-Madison. A state university. Pell Grant receivers' 4-year graduation rate is 20% below the general student poplation's rate. And it can be noted that the Pell Grant recipients drag down the general student population's rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2017, 07:34 AM
 
2,813 posts, read 2,113,241 times
Reputation: 6129
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, it is EXACTLY like that.

We know which group underperforms. Why do they get taxpayer funding while those who can achieve at a 20% higher rate, don't?
Huh. People in and around poverty--at a macro level--underperform compared to those in higher income groups...Shocking. They get taxpayer funding because they need it. Even at a 67% graduation rate, that's thousands and thousands of new college graduates each year, students who needed the financial assistance.

So you're arguing for more taxpayer money to be spent on raising the cut off for Pell Grants? What do you want to raise it to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top