Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2017, 07:41 AM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,959,794 times
Reputation: 7983

Advertisements

The Travel Ban did not make it on the Court's calendar today like many thought it would. Although they may announce it tomorrow instead, it's looking like they don't want to touch it.

Do you think they'll hear it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2017, 07:51 AM
 
13,685 posts, read 9,009,247 times
Reputation: 10405
I would imagine not. After all, each of the two travel bans had an expiration date (90 days or 120 days, I can't recall), which the Trump Administration stated was needed so that they could implement 'extreme vetting'. The implication was that by the end of said period that the Administration would roll out its new vetting procedure.


Indeed, on June 5th, President Trump tweeted that "In any event we are EXTREME VETTING people coming into the U.S. in order to help keep our country safe. The courts are slow and political!"


This, of course, being an official statement of the President (as per Sean Spicer), meant that the new vetting procedure was in place.


Indeed, on May 4, 2017, the Department of State published its new vetting procedures in the Federal Register for comment:


https://www.federalregister.gov/docu...tions-for-visa


Said FR cites the new questions that will be asked of people seeking visas.


As such, no need for the Court to take the case. There is no longer an issue to adjudicate. The President's desire to be 'vindicated' by the Court will not be considered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 07:52 AM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,338,537 times
Reputation: 10644
No, they won't take it on.

It's a clear-cut issue where Trump, once again, had no clue what he was talking about, and multiple courts, conservative and liberal, smacked him down already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,490 posts, read 17,226,594 times
Reputation: 35783
They should hear it and they should rule in favor of the President to make a decision that cannot be over turned by a lesser judge.

Trump wanted a 90 day pause from 7 countries that Obama himself had listed as dangerous and the most likely to produce a terrorist that would come to America and attack.


I foresee in the future, Trump as President gets a warning that there is an impending attack planned by terrorist that are coming from Syria, he exercises his presidential rights by pausing travel from Syria for 30, 60, 90 days until our guys can get to the bottom of the threat. In the meantime some feel good PC Lib of a judge stops the travel pause because "it is mean" and unwittingly allows the terrorist group in and they then hijack a plane and we know what happens then.


The Federal judges that stopped the travel pause did so out of political reasons and that is not their place to make those decisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,271 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15640
Since they won't take it until September at the earliest why would it even matter? This was to be temporary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 08:13 AM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,959,794 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Since they won't take it until September at the earliest why would it even matter? This was to be temporary.
The President has made it a hot button issue for the court system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 08:17 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,533,837 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
The Travel Ban did not make it on the Court's calendar today like many thought it would. Although they may announce it tomorrow instead, it's looking like they don't want to touch it.

Do you think they'll hear it?
NO

It was a temporary 90-day ban so they could check the vetting and make changes if they chose. It could have been done already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 08:20 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,533,837 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
They should hear it and they should rule in favor of the President to make a decision that cannot be over turned by a lesser judge.

Trump wanted a 90 day pause from 7 countries that Obama himself had listed as dangerous and the most likely to produce a terrorist that would come to America and attack.


I foresee in the future, Trump as President gets a warning that there is an impending attack planned by terrorist that are coming from Syria, he exercises his presidential rights by pausing travel from Syria for 30, 60, 90 days until our guys can get to the bottom of the threat. In the meantime some feel good PC Lib of a judge stops the travel pause because "it is mean" and unwittingly allows the terrorist group in and they then hijack a plane and we know what happens then.


The Federal judges that stopped the travel pause did so out of political reasons and that is not their place to make those decisions.
Did you happen to notice that it is past 90 days now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 08:22 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,533,837 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Since they won't take it until September at the earliest why would it even matter? This was to be temporary.
Trump has to START winning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 08:26 AM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,959,794 times
Reputation: 7983
Stay was just granted they will hear it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top