Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't get why so many miss the obvious. My guess... They're "emoting," and not thinking rationally or logically.
The 'obvious' to you hasn't been obvious to lower courts and administrative agencies. It wont be obvious to at least 3 SC justices, probably more.
It's obvious to you [and me] that the the word 'sex' in the Civil Rights Act did not and should not cover sexual orientation. Not so obvious to some lower courts. I guess your optimism doesn't affect anything any more than this discussion does, but calling the baker a slam dunk winner totally ignores the social/political views of the judges.
Opinions don't matter. Law does. And the SCOTUS Judges have sworn an oath to uphold the US Constitution and Federal Law.
Please find the post where I said they they do not have to up hold their oath?You are wrong, if there is anywhere in this country "OPINIONS MATTER" it is in the SCOTUS.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
