Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mueller most likely cares about it. Trump admitted to blackmail via twitter today. Scarborough has texts and phone call logs to prove it. This could result in High Crimes & Misdemeanors - an impeachable offense.
Trump's criminal defense attorneys are going to be working OT this weekend.
Wonder how long until Scarborough is interviewed by investigators and his text and phone records are requested.
I work for a living. I have seen many people of various backgrounds and levels of means who work for a living who don't agree with this, either.
This is indefensible FROM A SITTING PRESIDENT.
It's not just blanket "indefensible." If Trump said this while running his reality show, I'd have no issue with it, other than thinking it was tacky to attack a woman's appearance, but whatever. It would be one private citizen attacking another.
Having money, being from money, and anchoring a news channel show are not REMOTELY equal to being the President of the United States, the Chancellor of Germany, the PM of Canada... you following me here?
And, my comparison to a Police Chief attacking a citizen in a town is EXACTLY a valid comparison. How about Police Chief attacks the local owner of a prominent business?
There you go. It's not appropriate. Police Chief has authority. Businessman may have clout, but does not have authority.
That's the Mika/Trump thing in a nutshell. Mika has clout. She has no authority.
Trump has both and is the President of what is arguably the most powerful country in the world and you think it's okay if he makes fun of a woman's face on Twitter because she called him out for posting fake TIME magazine covers in his golf clubs?
Whoa.
You cannot be serious.
Responses.
If haven't run into a person outside of this forum that cares about it or even knows how Mika Brezinski might be.
Indefensible means indefensible. You attempt to defend someone simply because they are against Trump.
Your police chief example is a red herring. You make up a hypothetical generality to address a specific instance.
You think it's OK for a major News network to make up lies about the President. It's a double standard.
If you can't see the difference between a TV pundit on a cable channel and the PRESIDENT and leader of the free world then you are being total disingenuous. Come on now, Kitty, get real and defend your man on the merits (or lack thereof) of what he tweeted to Mica. Can't do it, can you.
How is calling out the king of fake news for having fake TIME magazines displayed bashing?
The man who loves to call the media fake news, have fake Time magazine covers. Then gets mad when he is called out on that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
