Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:21 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,678,698 times
Reputation: 14050

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BicoastalAnn View Post
And anyway, does this new moral standard mean Republicans think it was cool for Bill to screw interns in his office, since Roger Ailes was doing it? Personally I still think it was shameful but I guess I'm guilty of double standard thinking.
If Bill would have done 13 yo's and slapped them across the face the GOP would be a bit more supportive- but his was consensual and (as far as known) other adults.

Also, if Clinton ran a news outlet that spewed hate and blood he would also be more accepted by the right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:21 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,636,151 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
No, only the hardcore cultists think like this. Mainstream Americans who voted for Trump can't stand his idiotic, lying tweets.
This says otherwise.



He was tweeting before the election and you guys were complaining about it then too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:24 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,677,065 times
Reputation: 21999
Hm, now that IQ has been mentioned...

I'd be very interested in knowing Trump's IQ, since it's been said repeatedly that he's not even capable of explaining the healthcare plan, and he's clearly unable to understand the basics of the Constitution.

For that matter, I'd like to see his college transcripts. Supposedly, he was a mediocre student.

On the other hand, Obama was smart enough not only to make it into Harvard, but made Law Review, and Bill Clinton was Phi Beta Kappa and a Rhodes scholar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:24 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,636,151 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeanneVanderbilt View Post
Those tweets Trump sends out tells the world he has better things to do than concentrate on the many issues he SHOULD be focusing on.
LOL. Trump made 3 tweets. How long do you think this takes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:24 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,295,922 times
Reputation: 7284
Default Entire New York Post editorial in response to Trump's Mika tweets

Quote:
Stop. Just stop.
That's it. 3 words.

Hopefully, succinct enough for Donald to understand.

The Post’s take on Trump’s tweet | New York Post

Also from the New York Post. After he sent the tweet, Trump ran around the West Wing asking staffers what they thought of the tweet.

Quote:
Said Trump: “I know it wasn’t presidential, but what did you think?”
When you lose The Post.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:25 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,636,151 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigiri View Post
If Bill would have done 13 yo's and slapped them across the face the GOP would be a bit more supportive- but his was consensual and (as far as known) other adults.

Also, if Clinton ran a news outlet that spewed hate and blood he would also be more accepted by the right.
By today's workplace & government standards, Bill Clinton committed sexual assault and harrassment on the intern. Doesn't matter if she agreed to it or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:26 PM
 
7,489 posts, read 4,956,715 times
Reputation: 8031
What a mess! Indeed he is targeting "America First". Too bad he seems unable to have a more positive influence.

"What started yesterday as an undignified personal spat between Donald Trump and the hosts of a cable news show has morphed into something much more sinister - allegations of White House machinations that tread ever so close to outright blackmail.

If what Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough say is true, they were the targets of political dark arts reminiscent of the schemes of the Watergate "fixers" during the Nixon White House. Could Trump aides have really used the threat of an embarrassing story in a tabloid newspaper to pressure the two hosts to provide more favourable coverage?

The Trump administration will surely deny the charges, although the president himself lent some corroboration by tweeting that Scarborough asked him to tell the National Enquirer to bury an article about him.

That the president said he rejected such a request only raises more questions about the editorial control Mr Trump may have over a newspaper that routinely targeted his political opponents in 2016."

Mika Brzezinski-Trump row: White House accused of smear threat - BBC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:26 PM
 
5,315 posts, read 2,114,602 times
Reputation: 2572
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
I did. Yet you keep arguing that Mika & Trump should be treated differently for behavior that you describe as "indefensible". The only difference between the two is that Mika started it. If she had not, then Trump would have paid her no mind.

And there in lies the irony. You have been talking about MSNBC all day. Good day for Mika too.
You are still dancing around it all.

Forget this equivalency thing. What do you think of Trump doing this? Is it appropriate for a president, any president, to act like this?

Start there. Forget this "She started it" nonsense. Look at the act itself. Should a President say those things officially (as his tweets have been deemed official communications) to his citizens?

And I have put forth things that could happen to Mika for talking like this. If you are equating their actions, Trump should be held to the same possibilities happening to him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
3,909 posts, read 2,122,988 times
Reputation: 1644
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
This says otherwise.



He was tweeting before the election and you guys were complaining about it then too.
You now posted the same electoral map 10 times. Congratulations! My dog doesn't even do the same thing 3 times in a row, hes a smart dog!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 03:27 PM
 
2,333 posts, read 1,489,626 times
Reputation: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
This says otherwise.



He was tweeting before the election and you guys were complaining about it then too.
He wasn't the President then!!! Lord. He even SAID he would stop tweeting because it's not presidential. (Here's a reminder)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top