Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:20 AM
 
8,885 posts, read 5,365,025 times
Reputation: 5690

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natsku View Post
The hospital wants to make sure he stops suffering any longer. I understand why the parents want to try everything but the sad fact is that nothing will help this baby and the kindest and only right thing to do is to let him die peacefully with his mum and dad holding him which is what the hospital is letting happen and what the courts ordered.

I hope if I were ever in such a horrible situation I would have the courage to end my child's suffering even though it would hurt me to 'pull the plug' - I hope any loving parent would have that courage.
Actually that isn't the hospital's job (ie making sure he stops suffering). Now what they could do if they don't want to be party to this is discharge him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:21 AM
 
8,885 posts, read 5,365,025 times
Reputation: 5690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
I have a question for you and others who do not believe this child should have been allowed to die.


If you were in the same condition as this child, with no hope of recovery, would you want your family to spend their last dime and live their lives around keeping you alive?
I'd want my family to decide. That isn't happening here. In this case, we have a hospital deciding for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:27 AM
 
8,885 posts, read 5,365,025 times
Reputation: 5690
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
https://medicalkidnap.com/2017/06/20...-for-adoption/

I guess you just didn't read this one:

Insurance companies denied treatment to patients, offered to pay for assisted suicide, doctor claims - Washington Times

“It was estimated that their chance for cure — cure, not just adding time — of about 50 percent in one case and 70 percent in the other case,” Dr. Callister said.

If one of those above were one of your kids, you'd do exactly what about it? Unplug them, grab them up and make a run for Mexico?
I guess you didn't hear that the state of Oregon was way ahead of the private sector in the encouraging of people to terminate their own existance.

There is this thing called discharge AMA (against medical advice.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:27 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,512,088 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
Actually that isn't the hospital's job (ie making sure he stops suffering). Now what they could do if they don't want to be party to this is discharge him.
He was on life support. Discharging him means he dies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gungnir View Post
To be crass, the child is warm and dead. The sole indication of "life" is a pulse. There is no treatment for its condition because we do not have neural regeneration technologies even in trial. Or have you seen former paraplegics walking around in your region?

We have two parents who really don't want to see the truth, Charlie is Hovis. They're fighting a good fight, but every single court to the highest court in Europe have come back with the same judgement. It's not like the Docs decided one day to just be complete bastards and kill this kid just for s**ts and giggles, he has at best no consciousness, and at worst only enough consciousness to know he's wracked with unimaginable agony. If that's being psycho, then maybe we need a little more of it.

Finally it doesn't matter one hoot where this happened under what flavor of health system. He could be the sole and firstborn progeny of the richest person ever to have lived and the outcome would be going to be the same the condition is beyond the ability of medical science to resolve, and maybe for ever. The kid was doomed from conception, tough break, but the truth.
^^^^ This.

I realize that the WORST thing a patient can hear from a doctor is NO. No more treatment. But sometimes it has to be said. Because parents' can't always say it; that is their child; they will stop at nothing - even if it amounts to torture - to keep their child alive. I get that. So . . the doctor has to say it.

There ARE parents who have had to make the difficult choice - at great personal cost - to withdraw life support. But they did it. Because quality of life does matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:33 AM
 
8,885 posts, read 5,365,025 times
Reputation: 5690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
He was on life support. Discharging him means he dies.
Well staying in that hospital means he dies as well. You tell the parents to find another facility to accept him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
27,140 posts, read 13,429,141 times
Reputation: 19433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
I'd want my family to decide. That isn't happening here. In this case, we have a hospital deciding for them.
The Hospital didn't make the decision, the Courts did.

When parents do not agree about a child’s future treatment, it is standard legal process to ask the courts to make a decision. The Hospital wanted to start giving pallative treatment including pain relief before turning off the life support machines.

The case went to the Family Division of the High Court then to the Court of Appeal then to the UK Surpeme Court and then to the European Court of Human Rights. So it's been before four courts.

Leading experts presented evidence throughout the case, and the decision was even reviewed by Doctors in Spain, who came to exactly the same conclusion as British Doctors.

The treatment in the US would not have cured the child and we don't know how much pain he is in, because he cannot see, he cannot hear, he cannot make a noise, he cannot move and is serverly brain damaged, whilst his condition is terminal and the hospital will now be able to turn off the ventialator and feeding machine in order that he die naturally having been given pain relief.

The hospital argued that it was inhumane to permit the current condition to continue and having heard the evidence from numerous experts, all the Courts agreed.

Last edited by Brave New World; 07-02-2017 at 09:48 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:36 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,477,951 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
I'd want my family to decide. That isn't happening here. In this case, we have a hospital deciding for them.
It's being discounted completely that this "family" has ignored all specialists and others giving them the benefit of their education and expertise to merely plunge ahead regardless of what would abvioously be in the best interests of this poor child.

I don't understand that nonsense of denying a child a life saving blood transfusion because it goes against the adult "family's" choice of some stupid religion either, but that's probably just me..

There are times when some other entity may be better able to think rationally and in the best interests of the child.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:39 AM
 
8,885 posts, read 5,365,025 times
Reputation: 5690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
The Hospital didn't make the decision, the Courts did.

When parents do not agree about a child’s future treatment, it is standard legal process to ask the courts to make a decision.

The case went to the Family Division of the High Court then to the Court of Appeal then to the UK Surpeme Court and then to the European Court of Human Rights.

Experts presented evidece throughout the case, and the decision as even reviwed by Doctors in Spain, who came to exactly the same conclusion as British Doctors.

The treatment in the US would not have cured the child and we don't know howm much pain he is in because he cannot see, he cannot hear, he cannot make a noise and he cannot move, he is also terminally ill and the hospital will nowe be able to turn off the ventialator and fedding machine in order that he die naturally having been given pain killers.
Who brought the matter to the courts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,800,800 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
Not this!

The insurance company would be happy to release the child for a possible treatment and be off the financial hook. And even if they did declare that they could pay no further, they would not have the right to turn the machine off.
Quote:

This child has literally been seized and sentenced to death by the government of the U.K. Anyone who thinks this is acceptable is an ideological psychopath.
That child has been seized and sentenced to death by nature. Medicine can only do so much. However, if a parent wants to pay to keep his heart beating, so be it. Our world simply does not have the resources to keep the heart beating in an otherwise dead person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2017, 09:44 AM
 
8,885 posts, read 5,365,025 times
Reputation: 5690
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
It's being discounted completely that this "family" has ignored all specialists and others giving them the benefit of their education and expertise to merely plunge ahead regardless of what would abvioously be in the best interests of this poor child.

I don't understand that nonsense of denying a child a life saving blood transfusion because it goes against the adult "family's" choice of some stupid religion either, but that's probably just me..

There are times when some other entity may be better able to think rationally and in the best interests of the child.
So when Brusan decides a family's belief is stupid to heck with what the family wants?

The family had made arrangements to remove the child from the care of hospital. It seems the hospital and the courts have decided we are getting our own way no matter what the family thinks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top