Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Did Trump and company collude with an enemy of the USA to win the presidency?
Yes 213 59.83%
No 143 40.17%
Voters: 356. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2017, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,284 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15643

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrench409 View Post
So, if he were a democrat and his last name wasn't Trump, would the whole controversy and this thread even exist?

I think not.


If it were Chelsea Clinton meeting with a lawyer to get Russian intel I'm sure they would dismiss this immediately.

 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:00 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,017 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13710
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
The Lynch business is just a distraction for the dimwitted.

Makes no difference who approved her visa, it was illegal for Trump Jr., Kushner, Manafort and Lord knows who else to meet with her to discussion sanctions, dirt on Clinton, or any other campaign-related or foreign-affairs related matters.
It actually WAS illegal for the Congress members and State Department officials she lobbied to repeal the Magnitsky Act to meet with her. Now what?

And WHT was she doing in a Congressional hearing on foreign affairs? How in the hell did the Obama Administration allow that?
 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:01 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
A US Attorney testifying in Court that the law only allows the US AG to do so isn't good enough for you? Please.
Enough of your nonsense. Post the link that Lynch approved this.
 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:02 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
It actually WAS illegal for the Congress members and State Department officials she lobbied to repeal the Magnitsky Act to meet with her. Now what?

And WHT was she doing in a Congressional hearing on foreign affairs? How in the hell did the Obama Administration allow that?
Do you read your posts before you click "submit?"

Trying to blame Obama and Lynch for Trump Jr. breaking the law is beyond ridiculous.
 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:03 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,017 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13710
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Enough of your nonsense. Post the link that Lynch approved this.
A US Attorney testified in Court that the US AG approved it. Period.

If you have any doubts, get the Court transcript.
 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:11 AM
TKO
 
Location: On the Border
4,153 posts, read 4,278,102 times
Reputation: 3287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
If it were Chelsea Clinton meeting with a lawyer to get Russian intel I'm sure they would dismiss this immediately.
Right? Because they control all three branches of government but it's still a grand conspiracy against them. It's surreal.
 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:12 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
A US Attorney testified in Court that the US AG approved it. Period.

If you have any doubts, get the Court transcript.
I have no idea why a US Attorney said this or even if he actually did, but Lynch's spokesperson had clearly stated Lynch “does not have any personal knowledge of Ms. Veselnitskaya's travel.”

I have seen no evidence that Lynch was personally involved in this matter.

Even if she was, it makes absolutely no difference to Trump Jr.'s legal position.

This is another feeble Obama-did-it attempt to distract.
 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:21 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,017 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13710
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
I have no idea why a US Attorney said this or even if he actually did
It'll be in the Court proceedings transcripts. They were obtained by reporters at The Hill, so you can get them, too.
 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:25 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
It'll be in the Court proceedings transcripts. They were obtained by reporters at The Hill, do you can get them, too.

I'm not all that interested in researching the lies that you and Trump tell. That would be a full-time undertaking.

If you have some evidence to post, then do so.
 
Old 07-16-2017, 06:27 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,017 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13710
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Even if she was, it makes absolutely no difference to Trump Jr.'s legal position.
What 'legal position?' According to Akhmetshin, any supposed documents presented proved nothing.

Quote:
"Veselnitskaya brought with her a plastic folder with printed-out documents that detailed what she believed was the flow of illicit funds to the Democrats, Akhmetshin said. Veselnitskaya presented the contents of the documents to the Trump associates and suggested that making the information public could help the campaign, he said.

...Trump Jr. asked the attorney if she had sufficient evidence to back up her claims, including whether she could demonstrate the flow of the money. But Veselnitskaya said the Trump campaign would need to research it more. After that, Trump Jr. lost interest, according to Akhmetshin."
https://apnews.com/dceed1008d8f45afb...'s-meeting
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top