Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh good defund the organization that keeps people that shouldn't have kids from getting pregnant so we have more generations of welfare queens. Solid logic.
Meh...... it would be an easy way to generate $1B. Kids already know how to prevent pregnancy. Planned Parenthood is just an arm of The Democratic Party - with a CEO who makes $600 thousand a year.
It would be hard to become a welfare queen in today's environment; even harder if the wall were built with EBT money. Trump has proposed a cut of $193 billion from Department of Agriculture (they supervise the growing of Twinkies, among other things)over the next 10 years. The wall should cost about $60 billion.
So let them provide birth control then and eliminate the abortions. What's the problem?
If the abortions are going to happen regardless, there's a societal benefit to having them done safely. Making it illegal or unattainable just pushes women to risky procedures that can cause great health harms at our expense. Safe abortions are cheaper than back alley abortions.
There are other ways to prevent pregnancy other than abortions after it's too late. Cut the welfare and they will probably stop having kids they can't pay for in the first place. Now there's a novel idea.
I don't think very many people have children in order to get more welfare money because the average increase in TANF for each additional child averages about $28 a month..that doesn't even cover diapers, let alone everything else you need for a kid
I don't think very many people have children in order to get more welfare money because the average increase in TANF for each additional child averages about $28 a month..that doesn't even cover diapers, let alone everything else you need for a kid
I'll admit, even I didn't know that, and I'm pretty liberal
How does he think someone can throw a 60-lb sack of drugs over a wall? Who would just be strolling along the wall to get hit by a sack of drugs? And why would someone throw a sack of drugs over the wall if there was nobody on the other side to get the drugs?
What planet does Trump live on? It must be difficult for some to keep a straight face when his presidential musings sound like an SNL bit.
Does he have a contract with the American Comedian's Association to provide enough material to boost their ratings for 4 years?
"...As horrible as it sounds, when they throw the large sacks of drugs over, and if you have people on the other side of the wall, you don't see them. They hit you on the head with 60 pounds of stuff? It's over..."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
)over the next 10 years. The wall should cost about $60 billion.
