Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why should Trump admit to a crime that does not exist, besides that there was no collusion of any kind.
Meeting with someone that claims to have evidence of corruption on your political opponent is not a crime, in fact it is a very common occurrence in American politics.
why should it matter where they are from?
Why don't you leftist admit that this is just a cover up for how horrible a candidate Hillary was?
RR
The mental gymnastics You guys do to protect Deal Leader is beyond bizarre. If anyone with a D behind the name had done even half of this, you would be losing your minds.
Trumpers love to point out that collusion is not a crime and a big nothing burger.
Okay if it is as you say it is why doesn't Trump admit collusion and end all these investigations into collusion.
What does he have to lose? Jared, Don Jr, and all those dragged into this investigation would end except for all their lies or cover-ups made during the course of the investigations.
We can all guess that with all this drip, drip, drip, that it is only a matter of time before
Trump himself is implicated.
So why delay?
Admit it and get it over with.
Your problem, and the problem of the entire Left who are screaming "collusion!" is that you do not know what collusion actually is. There has been no collusion, which is a crime. "Collusion" has a specific legal definition, and based on that definition, no collusion has taken place. Simply meeting with foreign government agents, or people purporting to represent a foreign government, for "opposition research" is not, "collusion." And, it is not a crime.
However, in the case of Hillary Clinton, there has been collusion. The Uranium One 'deal' was collusion, to profit the Clinton foundation.
It may be and I believe it is. But if you do not believe it to be a crime, my point is admit and get it done with. After all, we all know how this will end.
The Republican Trumps are being accused of collusion with the Russians to win the election which to many is a crime yet I feel if the Democrats had done the same thing it would be called Politics.
The Democrats didn`t do the same thing so your post is pointless.
Your problem, and the problem of the entire Left who are screaming "collusion!" is that you do not know what collusion actually is. There has been no collusion, which is a crime. "Collusion" has a specific legal definition, and based on that definition, no collusion has taken place.
However, in the case of Hillary Clinton, there has been collusion. The Uranium One 'deal' was collusion, to profit the Clinton foundation.
Ok sorry comrade, it is not collusion. In fact it appears to be a CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY to commit a FELONY act of receiving thugs of value from a FOREIGN nationals and/or government to aid in US ELECTIONS.
Sorry, but I can't spell it any clearer than that. I know Trumpkins and republicans are generally against higher education, so if you still don't get it you may want to consider going back to school. Russian law school does not count.
[quote=nononsenseguy;48845612]Your problem, and the problem of the entire Left who are screaming "collusion!" is that you do not know what collusion actually is. There has been no collusion, which is a crime. "Collusion" has a specific legal definition, and based on that definition, no collusion has taken place.
However, in the case of Hillary Clinton, there has been collusion. The Uranium One 'deal' was collusion, to profit the Clinton foundation.[/quot
Hiding behind Hillary`s skirt every time a new Trump scandal comes to light isn`t going to save crooked Trump and his whole crooked family. You`re just embarrassing yourself.
The cover up is the crime and it is leading to a bunch of new accusations .( see Nixon)
There has been no cover-up, either. But Hillary was trying to cover-up her crimes, smashing iPhones with hammers, using BleachBit to erase hard drives, and refusing to turn over documents even after they had been subpoenaed. Hillary has committed every crime the Left claim that Trump and his team committed (without any proof), yet they turn a blind eye.
Speculation is that if trump wasn't at that meeting last June, he either dialed in or was told about it later. Remember that day he promised to spill dirt on Hilary. So if there's nothing wrong with it, just admit it and be done with it.
Of course he and his family and spokespeople have already lied hundreds of times saying no one had any contact with Russians, but the lies don't bother his trumpettes at all anyway.
None of his family have lied, but you people certainly do love to ignore Hillary's many lies, including her Benghazi lies, email lies, lies about the "pay for play" scheme, etc, etc, etc.
You people have lost all credibility, and your party is in meltdown.
Well, if not a crime, Trump should just come out and say, "I colluded with the Russians". All these investigations would end.
Once again, Why should Pres. Trump admit to something he did not do?
RR
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
