Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is possible the cover-up is bigger than the crime, but even if so, why the need for continued false statements?
We didn't see nearly the level of cover-up and outright lies regarding Benghazi or any of the other investigations Republicans spent the better part of six years in Congress while they weren't creating actual legislation, so at some point you have to say where there's smoke there's fire (at least enough for Mueller to continue to do his job without impediment).
If Trump indeed finds a way to axe Mueller, it will be the beginning of the end, even with a Republican congress.
So, please, what are the facts that prove collusion or hacking?
No one questions that Russia hacked the DNC and the election offices of several states. There is unanimous bipartisan agreement on that fact, along with US and European intelligence, and private computer security experts.
No one knows what evidence Mueller has on collusion. That evidence is classified or sealed. Cops don't usually release evidence before trial. When he issues indictments that will tell us a lot.
If you won't accept what was offered, then why did you ask for it in the first place?
Just looking for actual evidence. I did read the Wiki link...and it offered none.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.