Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2017, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,597,802 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
NK making missile - ready nuclear weapons per US intelligence
If Trump denounces it as fake news, then its probably true. If he does not, then he probably leaked the news himself to build a case for war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2017, 11:40 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,640,522 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
North Korea just tested a missile that can hit the US. They already have nuclear capability. The remaining steps for miniaturization and delivery will be resolved soon enough. It should be evident to everyone that sanctions won't stop them.

So we need to start reasoning as if NK already has or will imminently have this weapon. There are only two real choices: (1) engage diplomatically with them, respecting that they are a nuclear power, and relying on the deterrent effect of mutually assured destruction, or (2) engage militarily to prevent them from finalizing and fully institutionalizing this weapons system. The first one will give NK a lot of what they want and validate their strategy for future rogue dictators, likely further increasing nuclear weapons proliferation in other nations; the second will likely kill hundreds of thousands of people.

What doesn't help is the "head in the sand" approach I'm reading on here, similar to what conservatives advocate for global warming. This threat is not just going to go away.
Why not let global warming solve the problem. N K will be underwater soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2017, 11:56 AM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,603,454 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
How about the Fox report with anonymous sources that trump retweeted earlier? Was that real news?
I never said it was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2017, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,597,802 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
NK making missile - ready nuclear weapons per US intelligence
In the meanwhile, Trump is getting ready for golf outing #84.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2017, 11:59 AM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,603,454 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
And ask yourself this: who is likely on average to have better information?

A. US intelligence personnel, who have access to the best spy technology on Earth and do this professionally

or

B. Some hillbilly conservative yahoo on city-data?

This is a real threat.
How silly.

It has not been established WHAT info the USA has on NK's nuclear abilities. The argument is over whether WaPo has it. Even hillbillies, as you call them, can figure that out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2017, 11:59 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,640,522 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashj007 View Post
I do not understand why this has been released to the WAPO? Why not a press conference for all the media? Or is this just another leak? Made up news??
WAPO is now the State Dept. they just haven't up-dated the name change. That may be the only thing they haven't leaked by unnamed sources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2017, 12:05 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,603,454 times
Reputation: 21097
It took
  • The USA 4 years to develop an atomic bomb, small enough to fit onto our largest bomber at the time. With that said, it was still a 22,000 pound monster. This with all of the industrial might of the USA and 100s of thousands working on it.
  • It took the USSR more than 6 years to do the same, and this with plans stolen from the USA.
So if North Korea has developed a deliverable atomic bomb as alleged by WaPo, then it's clear that it had to happen during the 8 years that Obama was handling foreign policy with NK.



This speaks for itself.

Last edited by WaldoKitty; 08-08-2017 at 12:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2017, 12:09 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,444,381 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
How silly.

It has not been established WHAT info the USA has on NK's nuclear abilities. The argument is over whether WaPo has it. Even hillbillies, as you call them, can figure that out.
There's a lot of info out there on their recent tests. There are a lot of people who study North Korea and nuclear weapons technology for a living, and they're sounding the alarm.

I'm supposed to put more credibility in a Trump shill's denialism than them?

Yeah, right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2017, 12:34 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,603,454 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
There's a lot of info out there on their recent tests..... .
Sure. But this isn't the question of the topic. Everyone knows they exploded a nuclear bomb of some sort deep in a cave.

WaPo claims they have made it small enough to be delivered to a remote target, presumably by missile. That claim is what we are talking about. There are NO TESTS out there that prove that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2017, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,152,432 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
North Korea just tested a missile that can hit the US. They already have nuclear capability. The remaining steps for miniaturization and delivery will be resolved soon enough.
There's no need for miniaturization. That's just something idiotic pundits yap about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
It took
  • The USA 4 years to develop an atomic bomb, small enough to fit onto our largest bomber at the time. With that said, it was still a 22,000 pound monster. This with all of the industrial might of the USA and 100s of thousands working on it.
  • It took the USSR more than 6 years to do the same, and this with plans stolen from the USA.
So if North Korea has developed a deliverable atomic bomb as alleged by WaPo, then it's clear that it had to happen during the 8 years that Obama was handling foreign policy with NK.



This speaks for itself.
And that's all irrelevant.

Fat Man was "fat," because there was no pre-exising data on wave-form technology or wave-shaping technology, and because there was a limited number of types of plastic explosives available. Knowledge of wave-form and wave-shaping technology is essential in order to uniformly collapse the thin-shelled hollow sphere of plutonium into a solid mass and maintain that mass long enough to generate a sufficient number of cascading chain reactions.

You can find data on wave-form and wave-shaping technology here:

https://www.science.gov/topicpages/p...+explosive+pbx

And declassified documents like this:

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/383490.pdf

And physics web-sites like this:

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/53

And at most university libraries and other places on the internet.

I would suggest that a 20-30 kt North Korean nuclear warhead is about 30" in diameter, 36" in length and weighs approximately 900 pounds, which would make it deliverable by North Korea's version of the SCUD missile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top