Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2017, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by somebodynew View Post
Thankfully the founding fathers allowed for the growth of the democracy.

Well, the founding fathers knew that we are NOT a Democracy, but a Constitutional Representative Republic. They knew Democracies were essentially MOB rule.


Quote:
The problem with state control is that economy of scale cannot be used to lift poor communities. So rich communities get richer and poor communities stay poor. This is an economically bad idea for the nation for which the economy is important. These poor people are not ADDING to the economy.

Individuals are able to move from poor to rich, and some "rich" become poor. It is a constant state of flux.

Last edited by Pilot1; 08-09-2017 at 08:56 AM..

 
Old 08-09-2017, 08:29 AM
 
14,294 posts, read 13,189,540 times
Reputation: 17797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Well, the founding fathers new that we are NOT a Democracy, but a Constitutional Representative Republic. They knew Democracies were essentially MOB rule.





Individuals are able to move from poor to rich, and some "rich" become poor. It is a constant state of flux.
You really think that? Do you know a lot of poor people? Do you know how much it costs to move? And that they don't start with the economic wherewithal to get housing in rich places? The idea that it is in a constant state of flux on a macro scale is indefensible by history and evidence.
 
Old 08-09-2017, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Cannes
2,452 posts, read 2,381,498 times
Reputation: 1620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bully View Post
Liberalism/leftism/progressivism requires full compliance by all members of society in order to work correctly, even at the theoretical level. The provider class in any redistributive economic system must be as willing to participate as the beneficiary class is, but very rarely is. The need to force compliance is often necessary. This is why leftism has always been accompanied by extreme and often violent intolerance of dissent wherever and whenever it has been imposed on a nation or culture.
Only at the theoretical level. Even in the perfect scenario, it wouldn't work. It sounds good but that's about it.
 
Old 08-09-2017, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Caribou, Me.
6,928 posts, read 5,905,231 times
Reputation: 5251
http://www.vulture.com/2017/08/the-t...a-twitter.html


This is but one glimpse into the madhouse world of today's insane left.
They have blown right past Orwell, Dilbert and Kafka..........we're into uncharted territory now!! lol


Seriously, it's as if Orwell and Koestler never wrote a single word; as if Terry Gilliam never made "Brazil"; as if the Cultural Revolution never took place. These people are absolutely, full-on, utterly and completely insane. Bonkers.
And not in a "GOOD" way, either.........lol..............in a really, really evil, terrible, wicked way.
 
Old 08-09-2017, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802
Quote:
Originally Posted by somebodynew View Post
You really think that? Do you know a lot of poor people? Do you know how much it costs to move? And that they don't start with the economic wherewithal to get housing in rich places? The idea that it is in a constant state of flux on a macro scale is indefensible by history and evidence.
I know a lot of poor people that came to this country with nothing, and became very, very successful. It happens all the time. They either got training, and education, and scrimped, and saved, and then got better, and better jobs. Some started their own businesses, worked hard, and became successful that way. So yes, I have.
 
Old 08-09-2017, 10:03 AM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,749,085 times
Reputation: 9985
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivingearth View Post
So, many of my liberals friends are so proud about how tolerant they and their liberal peers are. Yet, what i have observed is that they are tolerant only to people that think exactly like them...What's up with that?
Liberals are tolerant of Muslims who've committed atrocities yet are intolerant of Israelis (Jews) who do what they do to survive.

Rasmea Odeh comes to mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhITiw9g1Yk
 
Old 08-09-2017, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Austin
2,953 posts, read 993,129 times
Reputation: 2790
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivingearth View Post
So, many of my liberals friends are so proud about how tolerant they and their liberal peers are. Yet, what i have observed is that they are tolerant only to people that think exactly like them...What's up with that?
I realized this when I was about 10. My parents were/are highly liberal academics and I grew up in a household filled with their students and fellow faculty of the same persuasion. They are extremely well educated, intelligent, well meaning people and a cornerstone of their belief system is tolerance and yet at a very young age I began to realize just how judgmental they actually were. I always had a curious and somewhat contrarian nature so I questioned a lot of what they taught us. Their answers were always reasonable and well thought out but so tinged with an obvious judgmental condescending tone. Not so much towards the subject of the question but towards the questioner themselves. To question their approved belief system was a sign of a deficiency. Calling to their attention this judgmental intolerance towards a difference in perspective was met with blank stares of incomprehension and shock. Almost as if you revealed to someone that they had a split personality they were completely unaware of. This is a salient characteristic of liberals and it's not a new one. My folks are great people who taught me great things and exposed me to many wonderful experiences but their political ideology and the baggage that comes with it was something I decided I didn't need to carry forward. Suffice to say I've forgotten more about the workings of liberal mental machinery than most of you will ever know.

Here's a bit of advice for those of you who have a conservative bent and want to maintain a good relationship with liberal friends/family in these divisive times - My folks and I have a great relationship to this day but a big part of that is due to how I have to manage and steer the dynamic. They won't participate in that, it's up to me. They're very vocal and in your face about politics and love nothing more than to debate ... or what they think of as debate. Actually it's a one-dimensional monologue and if you disagree then things go downhill and it turns emotional for them. I handle this by finessing them into lines of discussion other than politics. Humor, light mockery when they moralize and diversion of the conversation towards consequential things, i.e. "real life" works well for me. I hate to tell you this, fellow apostates, but if you want a relationship it's going to be on you. They won't budge. Swallow your objections and be the adult. I'm mellow now and the whole thing is almost comical to me and my wife as we make the trip out to their farm for weekly visits. We psych ourselves up into a unified team of liberal management and mental jiu jitsu to make things work. Soldier on folks. You've gotta bend so that they don't break
 
Old 08-09-2017, 10:11 AM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wee-Bey View Post
I realized this when I was about 10. My parents were/are highly liberal academics and I grew up in a household filled with their students and fellow faculty of the same persuasion. They are extremely well educated, intelligent, well meaning people and a cornerstone of their belief system is tolerance and yet at a very young age I began to realize just how judgmental they actually were. I always had a curious and somewhat contrarian nature so I questioned a lot of what they taught us. Their answers were always reasonable and well thought out but so tinged with an obvious judgmental condescending tone. Not so much towards the subject of the question but towards the questioner themselves. To question their approved belief system was a sign of a deficiency. Calling to their attention this judgmental intolerance towards a difference in perspective was met with blank stares of incomprehension and shock. Almost as if you revealed to someone that they had a split personality they were completely unaware of. This is a salient characteristic of liberals and it's not a new one. My folks are great people who taught me great things and exposed me to many wonderful experiences but their political ideology and the baggage that comes with it was something I decided I didn't need to carry forward. Suffice to say I've forgotten more about the workings of liberal mental machinery than most of you will ever know.

Here's a bit of advice for those of you who have a conservative bent and want to maintain a good relationship with liberal friends/family in these divisive times - My folks and I have a great relationship to this day but a big part of that is due to how I have to manage and steer the dynamic. They won't participate in that, it's up to me. They're very vocal and in your face about politics and love nothing more than to debate ... or what they think of as debate. Actually it's a one-dimensional monologue and if you disagree then things go downhill and it turns emotional for them. I handle this by finessing them into lines of discussion other than politics. Humor, light mockery when they moralize and diversion of the conversation towards consequential things, i.e. "real life" works well for me. I hate to tell you this, fellow apostates, but if you want a relationship it's going to be on you. They won't budge. Swallow your objections and be the adult. I'm mellow now and the whole thing is almost comical to me and my wife as we make the trip out to their farm for weekly visits. We psych ourselves up into a unified team of liberal management and mental jiu jitsu to make things work. Soldier on folks. You've gotta bend so that they don't break
C-D wont let me rep you any more
 
Old 08-09-2017, 10:18 AM
 
16,345 posts, read 18,063,833 times
Reputation: 7879
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivingearth View Post
Here is the catch. Conservative don't "advertise" themselves as "all warm fuzzy" like liberals do. My liberals friends are all for socialism , helping minorities, defending LGBT but don't you dare say you are conservative, or that you believe capitalism is the only system that works in the real world. Then they become very hostile. Here in Brazil where i currently reside. The liberals, preach acceptance and equality but are violent to anyone who dares to think different and support the right...
As a liberal, I must've missed the part where we were supposed to be "warm and fuzzy" and accepting of everything everyone believes, does or says. If someone believes that, they really have no honest understanding of what being liberal is or what those beliefs entail. In fact, I'd go as far as saying that the whole "liberals are supposed to be tolerant of everything" is entirely a conservative-made straw man built for the sole purpose of tearing down when it's convenient, such as in one of these ridiculous threads.
Let's just state the obvious: Liberals are not tolerant of everything and never have been. Nor should they be. I'm pretty satisfied being intolerant of things like racism, LGBT discrimination or support for presidents who disgrace the office and endanger the country with endless *sshattery. The real problem some conservatives have with social liberals is that they don't like that their backwards, ignorant views are pointed out and maligned. Well, too bad. If you don't like it, maybe learn to be a better human being.

Last edited by jbcmh81; 08-09-2017 at 10:28 AM..
 
Old 08-09-2017, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,604,784 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by nurider2002 View Post
Let me put your minds at ease. I consider myself very liberal, compared to most posters here and, I do NOT consider myself at all tolerant of conservative values. No apology. Proud to be an intolerant liberal.
👍👍👍😂😂😂 I love it and am right there with you lol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top