Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Should folks on social media inform the employers of these protesters considering they've committed a criminal act?
Folks who simply attended the rally this past weekend in Virginia were doxxed. These folks who took part in toppling the statue have actually broken the law.
Will you support outing these protesters? Did you support outing the protesters this past weekend?
Absolutely. Vandalism, especially when it involves the destruction of taxpayer-funded property, absolutely needs to be punished. Now, as far as "doxing"-wouldn't her employer (assuming she actually has one) find out if she spends a couple months in jail?
Absolutely. Vandalism, especially when it involves the destruction of taxpayer-funded property, absolutely needs to be punished. Now, as far as "doxing"-wouldn't her employer (assuming she actually has one) find out if she spends a couple months in jail?
I don't know if anyone was arrested today.
I'm sure law enforcement could find out the identities of these folks. Let's see if they prosecute.
Absolutely. Vandalism, especially when it involves the destruction of taxpayer-funded property, absolutely needs to be punished. Now, as far as "doxing"-wouldn't her employer (assuming she actually has one) find out if she spends a couple months in jail?
Lol. You're deluded. Unless these people have priors the worst they will get is fines.
Should folks on social media inform the employers of these protesters considering they've committed a criminal act?
Folks who simply attended the rally this past weekend in Virginia were doxxed. These folks who took part in toppling the statue have actually broken the law.
It's pretty confusing because I don't see the principle behind doxing if you aren't in a contractual agreement with someone to do so.
When 4chan doxed CNN employees they did it as retaliation for CNN threatening to dox a meme creator and/or sharer.
That I could understand.
Ok. Yesterday people all over social media were angry about the racists who held a rally that turned violent and needed with death and many people in the hospital. They saw all the angry frat bros, klans,en, whatever, and did not want them to just drive back to their towns and feel no repercussions. If they are going to go to someone's town and scream about racism, than that can follow them home. Public shaming 101. So people shared their pictures, hundreds of thousands of times until friends of friends of friends IDed these people. And their employers, classmates, friends and family could see them in all their tiki torch bat wielding glory.
No enough people cares enough about vandalizing a statue to share a picture or video all over the internet. It just won't get the traction it needs.
Contracts have nothing to do with it. The racists and nazis were doxxed because a whole lot of people don't like racists and nazis. Same cannot be said about vandals.
Ok. Yesterday people all over social media were angry about the racists who held a rally that turned violent and needed with death and many people in the hospital. They saw all the angry frat bros, klans,en, whatever, and did not want them to just drive back to their towns and feel no repercussions. If they are going to go to someone's town and scream about racism, than that can follow them home. Public shaming 101. So people shared their pictures, hundreds of thousands of times until friends of friends of friends IDed these people. And their employers, classmates, friends and family could see them in all their tiki torch bat wielding glory.
No enough people cares enough about vandalizing a statue to share a picture or video all over the internet. It just won't get the traction it needs.
Contracts have nothing to do with it. The racists and nazis were doxxed because a whole lot of people don't like racists and nazis. Same cannot be said about vandals.
I can see that but it clashes with the staunch "law and order" side of folks who oppose an owner's right to refuse service to anyone he wants.
I'm constantly told that "protected classes", as codified by government via law, is the reason why a business owner can't refuse service to certain people.
Here, the law is so paramount to these folks they find it necessary to force, at gunpoint, a man to provide the fruits of his labor to another.
That's the definition of slavery to me, codified or not.
So on one hand you have people who did not violate the law (that we know of) get doxed yet on the other hand a law breaker will probably not get doxed.
See the logical and moral inconsistency? If you felt that the protesters this past weekend should be doxed then you should really want to dox those who broke the law.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
