Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2017, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
Some of you seem to believe that the EPA is a new creature, perhaps created by Obama.
No they don't you made that up


Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
Of course, the Environmental Protection Act (strongly supported by Senator Goldwater, among others) was passed by Congress, and signed into law by Nixon, in 1970.


As such, I guess one must examine the economy since 1970. I recall very high inflation in the mid 1970s (thanks to OPEC), as well as a roaring economy under Reagan (in part thanks to cutting the very high personal income tax rate), etc.
More and tougher regulations now, so no you're wrong again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2017, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
Jobs are only one factor---I suggest that there may be others..like a clean environment and safe working conditions..that are also a social benefit.

Proof is in the pudding..and those States that are using renewable energy...and have strict regulations..seem to be doing better..than those States that use coal.
You base it on one data point and don't look into other factors like that states resources? Why are in this discussion when it's over your head?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,445,058 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Sigh... You have to pay people to enforce the regulations and companies loose money when they have to buy equipment to lessen the pollution. How in the world do you not know that? Something that simple and you couldn't fathom that?


Of course, but you ignore that the money spent does not stop there...you buy equip, you support jobs. Everyone that draws a salary...spends and contributes.

Something so simple...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,445,058 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
You base it on one data point and don't look into other factors like that states resources? Why are in this discussion when it's over your head?
ROTFLMAO!

It's never stopped you. Now has it?

Perhaps you shouldn't assume my ignorance...based on a post or two?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top