Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2017, 10:59 AM
 
24,407 posts, read 26,951,108 times
Reputation: 19977

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
The main people who have a problem with the "DNC" as you call it are the Antifa types and the far left who arent actually memebers of the Democratic Party.

and the reason i put the DNC in quotation marks is because I honestly dont think you or any of the Conservatives posting here know what it is . I have seen multiple Right wingers compare it to the DLC or vice versa.
The DNC stands for the Democratic National Committee, who are the formal governing body for the Democratic Party. They colluded with one of their candidates to help her get the nomination. The head resigned after the scandal leaked and Hillary hired her to be of her campaign.

Name Democratic politicians who don't consider the far left as Democrats? Warren seems to be the face of the Democratic Party these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2017, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,787,236 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
So it's the brown shirt Nazi Leftists ANTIFA versus America and its military....gee I wonder who will win?

Actually... it depends on who the Mayor and Governor are. We've seen progressive mayors stand down their police when Antifa and Black Bloc start hurting people. After getting so much exposure, hundreds of protestors and cops injured, a woman murdered... maybe they decided they were taking their partisan corruption a little too far.

We'll see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
The DNC stands for the Democratic National Committee, who are the formal governing body for the Democratic Party. They colluded with one of their candidates to help her get the nomination. The head resigned after the scandal leaked and Hillary hired her to be of her campaign.

Name Democratic politicians who don't consider the far left as Democrats? Warren seems to be the face of the Democratic Party these days.
TWO DNC chairs had to resign for the very same reasons. Now we are finding out that Wasserman-Schultz may be in some serious trouble for helping to funnel millions to a Pakistani spy. Tisk Tisk Debra
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 11:03 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6033
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
The DNC stands for the Democratic National Committee, who are the formal governing body for the Democratic Party. They colluded with one of their candidates to help her get the nomination. The head resigned after the scandal leaked and Hillary hired her to be of her campaign.

Name Democratic politicians who don't consider the far left as Democrats? Warren seems to be the face of the Democratic Party these days.
1. Individual DNC Members are allowed to work on campaigns. Only the DNC the State Executive Committees and the County Executive Committees are not allowed to endorse.

City and Regional Democratic Parties are actually "Clubs" and can endorse and work for who ever they like, just as individuals can.
2. Therefore, there is no collusion by the definition of the phrase you are using

3. That being said DWS never worked for the Clinton campaign, that was a right wing rumor that you have hilariously believed and continue to do so to this day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 11:05 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6033
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post



TWO DNC chairs had to resign for the very same reasons. Now we are finding out that Wasserman-Schultz may be in some serious trouble for helping to funnel millions to a Pakistani spy. Tisk Tisk Debra
DWS resigned because of Optics . Brazile never resigned, a new chair was elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 11:06 AM
 
24,407 posts, read 26,951,108 times
Reputation: 19977
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
1. Individual DNC Members are allowed to work on campaigns

2. There for, there is no collusion by the definition of the phrase you are using

3. That being said DWS never worked for the Clinton campaign, that was a right wing rumor that you have hilariously believed and continue to do so to this day.
The DNC head was working with podesta to figure out ways to bring down Bernie's poll numbers some strategies talking anout his faith in Christian states. It's horrendous! And yes DWS worked with Hillary after she resigned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 11:09 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,649,302 times
Reputation: 13053
[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
In what alternate reality do you think that the US Military is going after the damned DNC?

Good grief. Democrats are still "America."

I'm not a Democrat myself (nor am I a Republican), but this constant "the Dems are in SOOO much trouble" stuff is silly.

The DNC has issues, that's clear. The RNC does, too. If it didn't, they'd have had an actual Republican candidate in the White House right now.[/QUOTE]
The thread title or headline makes it clear that the thread is about the democrats trouble. Nothing in it suggest its about the GOP.

The National Guard is part of the military. They have been activated recently due to unrest. While they haven't really done anything yet and won't be going against the DNC directly. They may in the future, if activated, be up against the supporters of the DNC such as ANTIFA.

If you think that the Dems trouble is silly fine. I hope they share your opinion and continue to do nothing to change it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 11:10 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6033
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
The DNC head was working with podesta to figure out ways to bring down Bernie's poll numbers some strategies talking anout his faith in Christian states. It's horrendous! And yes DWS worked with Hillary after she resigned.
The email you speak of was some low level staffers talking to each other, none of which actually worked for Clinton, and Podesta and DWS were no where near it .

And again, DWS never worked for CLinton, not before not after. (i have no idea who she worked for in 2008)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 11:11 AM
 
24,407 posts, read 26,951,108 times
Reputation: 19977
Look at the chart I posted, it's not just the White House, the thing that should be more alarming bit of information. Democrats have been losing election after election, includig special elections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,935,949 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
Don't worry, they have Antifa to save them
Correction: they have the Donald and the Repubs running Congress to save them. By the time 2020 rolls around people will spit when they hear the name trump and the GOP will be in disarray because of infighting and a lack of progress. So keep telling yourself the DNC is dead, and yet you keep feeling the nee to beat that horse, is it because you know your boys are in trouble and you need to deflect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 11:14 AM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,368,360 times
Reputation: 17261
Notice how CONVENIENTLY the original graph ends at 2015? You can tell that because it doesn't show the gains they made in the house and senate in 2016. So why go to 2015? This is the definition of propaganda, designed to deceive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top