Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2008, 08:21 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,855,247 times
Reputation: 9283

Advertisements

Well, the story gets more and more interesting...

FOXNews.com - Weather Channel Founder: Sue Al Gore for Fraud - Science News | Science & Technology | Technology News (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,337710,00.html - broken link)

Never believed CO2 was any culprit to anything except bunk science and eco-capitalism at its finest...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2008, 08:25 AM
 
5,273 posts, read 14,545,143 times
Reputation: 5881
As if we don't have enough lame lawsuites already. It kind of reminds me of the Scopes trial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2008, 08:32 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,855,247 times
Reputation: 9283
Did you read the article? It was because Al Gore would never agree to a debate on the mertis of CO2 causing global warming... as someone who is so outspoken about it, he won't debate about its accuracy or even if its even true? It seem the only way for him to even debate about it was to sue him... if that is the only way the truth can come out.. eco-tards that keep insisting that CO2 emissions causes global warming would flee in droves..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2008, 10:35 AM
 
473 posts, read 1,245,593 times
Reputation: 141
Default Gore sued by weather channel founder

I read an article today that the founder of the weather channel may sue Gore for fraud over his theory of global warming.

I'm not a scientist and don't pretend to know one way or the other about global warming, but I'm going to take a man's word who founded the weather channel over the word of a man who claimed he invented the internet.

He wants to bring the debate of global warming to court for everyone to see. He says the mainstream media is supressing the truth about global warming. What I really found interesting is that he said for every 38 carbon particles in the atmosphere there is 100,000 other particles. He said carbon makes up a very very tiny portion of our atmosphere. He thinks carbon emission has little to no effect on climate change.

Curious about your thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2008, 10:41 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,855,247 times
Reputation: 9283
Hahaha... I already made a thread about this..

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...s-al-gore.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2008, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,221,236 times
Reputation: 6553
ROFL finally someone has challenged the liar. Bad science and coinsidence does not = fact.
Yes global warming is happening. Yes it is entirely possible that mans actions are exasperating the process. But much of what the fat man says and has said is absolute B.S.
Not to mention he refuses to practice what he preaches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2008, 10:43 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,855,247 times
Reputation: 9283
We should sue all those "scientists" who make up bunk science. If the medical industry is liable for bad medicine, then the science industry should be liable for bad science.. I hope they take every penny from Al "Liar" Gore..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2008, 10:48 AM
 
473 posts, read 1,245,593 times
Reputation: 141
They really should be sued. These lies could bring down our economy. If carbon credits become law it will shut down our economy. If these are lies and these lies turn into laws (fingers crossed McCain wins) and these laws put so much financial strain on America that people lose jobs, then yeah, I say sue the liar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2008, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Florida (SW)
48,132 posts, read 22,004,457 times
Reputation: 47136
John Coleman of **** TV in san diego is a loveable old Kook. He is rather like your eccentric old grandfather or uncle....a bit daft but absolutely harmless. The publicity he is getting from this is what keeps him going. I wouldnt take him too seriously!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2008, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,221,236 times
Reputation: 6553
One should keep in mind that the majority of the scientists involved are infact credible. Its the delivery that is highly questionable. It was delivered as though all scientists involved agreed with Al Gore's Summary. In fact they did not. Most only agreed with their own portion of the report. Not the conclusions of Al Gore and company.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top