Quote:
Originally Posted by reed067
You have a interesting point. Let one group at a time protest not sure if anything will change but it MIGHT cut back on the violence that's been going on.  If said group starts something then at least we know who to blame. |
No not one at a time. I want to test a theory here.
There's 1 common denominator with Charlottesville. The police dropped the ball in keeping both sides seperated. I want to see if it is a result of orders from within or via mayors offices. Then hold whomever is responsible for that at fault for loss of life and property.
I find it both highly entertaining and comical that with the price of health insurance and deductibles a bunch of dimwitted with a chip on their shoulders want to go out and beat the snot out of each other
Then cry to, or blame Trump for being responsible.
I say play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Do it up buttercup. Get your dodge challengers and pepper spray firecrackers clubs tiki torches and go ham.
Bunch of petulant whiney brats with nothing better to do.
Me. If I were insurance companies, I'd be writing in fine print very fine print at that, coverage no applicable in acts of riot and rage.
Remove the incentive to be treated for wounds see how quick those protests and wanting to kill each other ends...
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
