Would the US be better off as Monarchy? (enemies, parties, election)

[survivingearth]

Originally Posted by TheDusty

Ok, I'm still not following what it is you want me to be seeing.

I think I've made my point clear; the system we have is fine. Adding a monarch would to improve it.

Let me ask you a logistical question: who decides who the royal family is?

Charismatic question... Descendants of royalty in America?

[survivingearth]

Originally Posted by LeaveWI

Always going for your guns as the answer for everything!
Can you handle ANY situation without your guns over there?

Run out of dental floss- grab your guns

Someone used up all the toilet paper?- grab your guns

No more mountain dew in the vending machine- lock and load

ANY challenge or disagreement- reach for your guns.

Chickenhawks

What would be the Australian equivalent of " grabbing guns"?? Men At Work?

[TheDusty]

Originally Posted by survivingearth

Charismatic question... Descendants of royalty in America?

Well surely, based on the logic of birth right rule (or nominal rule, as the case may be), any dependent of royalty only has any claim to a title of royalty in their ancestral home.

The prince of England cannot move to Germany, then claim a right to some throne in Germany just because of his English royal blood.

[War Beagle]

Originally Posted by TheDusty

Let me ask you a logistical question: who decides who the royal family is?

In the UK it was decided by choosing the horsiest looking family.

[survivingearth]

Originally Posted by War Beagle

In the UK it was decided by choosing the horsiest looking family.

Good humor going on here...One good thing coming your way..Brexit.

[TheDusty]

Originally Posted by War Beagle

In the UK it was decided by choosing the horsiest looking family.

We will have to choose our animal look alike wisely.

I'm vetoing the turtle. It's not worth risking a McConnell royal family.

[survivingearth]

Originally Posted by TheDusty

Well surely, based on the logic of birth right rule (or nominal rule, as the case may be), any dependent of royalty only has any claim to a title of royalty in their ancestral home.

The prince of England cannot move to Germany, then claim a right to some throne in Germany just because of his English royal blood.

In Brazil there is also a Monarchist movement. And if it was implemented...This guy would be the "ruler"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince...A9ans-Braganza

[War Beagle]

Originally Posted by TheDusty

We will have to choose our animal look alike wisely.

I'm vetoing the turtle. It's not worth risking a McConnell royal family.

McConnell is a turtle that mated with a ferret.

[mohawkx]

Originally Posted by War Beagle

McConnell is a turtle that mated with a ferret.

That's good. The head of a 150 year old Galapagos Tortoise with the nimble body of a ferret.

[English Dave]

We've got a couple of spare Royals for ya, if you need a King. Harry is available. He has slipped down the pecking order since William had two kids.

Just find Harry an American bride, and away ya go..........