Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
I`ll try to help them. The statue doesn`t need to be taken down because he owned slaves. He led troops into battle against the U.S., the people who gave him a fine education at West Point. See the difference?
A U.S. that acted illegally, and brutally against the South purely for economic reasons, not slavery. That is why the South was welcomed back into the Union, they were Americans too, and even the Confederate soldiers are considered U.S. VETERANS. Your simplistic, naïve view of history is WRONG.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
182 posts, read 264,306 times
Reputation: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom1944 View Post
Would you support General William T Sherman statues?
The Sons of Unions Veterans and Sons of Confederate Veterans get along quite well and support each other and their monuments. One of the reasons is a period of time when the veterans of the war reconciled that we now know as 'The Grand Bargain.'

It was around the early 1900's that veterans from both sides decided to patch things up. Plus, the actual soldiers on both sides beloved they were fighting for a noble cause, regardless of the motives of the powers that be at the time.



"Robert Toombs or somebody once gave the best definition of that war I ever heard, "It was a war of one form of society against another form of society, and because one of those forms of society included chattel slavery and the other side didn't, except to a limited extent, it's always been identified as a war over slavery. Believe me, no soldier on either side gave a damn about the slaves, they were fighting for other reasons entirely in their minds.""

"Southerners thought they were fighting a second American revolution; Northerners thought they were fighting to hold the Union together, and that held true throughout the whole war, except for some people who were absolute partisans on both sides: fire eaters in South Carolina and abolitionists in Massachusetts. But most of the people were fighting because they were fighting for... Southerners once said I'm fighting because you are down here; if you want to invade my home you've got me to fight, others say you are trying to tear the fabric of the Union, therefore you should be put down and not allowed to do what you claim what you want to do."

"It's a very complex subject and I'm sorry to see it degenerate into a such things as identifying that flag as a symbol of racism, it is not. It was never intended as such. [The] Confederacy respected law above all things." ~ Shelby Foote
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:16 AM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,549,540 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by brownbagg View Post
there not a single person in united stated that agrees that slavery was good.
How can you be so sure? Did you ask everyone? Even if you did, I thought Trump don't like to answer polls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:17 AM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,732 posts, read 18,809,520 times
Reputation: 22579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gentleman Jason View Post
You Neo-Unionists can cling to your false narrative all you want if it makes you feel better. It's all slander and hate speech.
They don't get it. They think it is something like the group who broke away at Waco, TX. They don't understand that it was over HALF THE NATION that decided to break away. And it's not at all clear, whether their motives were good or bad, that they didn't have the right to do so. Had they not fired on Sumter, there is an outside chance that they would have indeed "gone their separate way." Or, possibly, things would have been patched up.

Ultimately, slavery was an archaic, barbaric institution that had been practiced throughout the world since the beginning, but was largely being phased out in modern nations at the time. It was only a matter of time before it wound have been economically unfeasible in the south and would have been done away with anyway--and then outlawed.

There was quite a large group of Confederates who fled to Brazil after the Civil War (look up Confederados). Some practiced slavery until it was outlawed in Brazil a few years later. There was no war over that. The former slaveholders adapted and that was the end of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:18 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gentleman Jason View Post
... the actual soldiers on both sides beloved they were fighting for a noble cause, regardless of the motives of the powers that be at the time.
...
Confederate soldiers may have believed they were fighting for a noble cause, just as the Nazis believed they were fighting for a noble cause.

Both were wrong.

The pardon from Lincoln, Grant, and the North, the "Grand Bargain," the statues... have all led Confederates to fantasize there was honor in treason.

There isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:21 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gentleman Jason View Post
.
"It's a very complex subject and I'm sorry to see it degenerate into a such things as identifying that flag as a symbol of racism, it is not. It was never intended as such. [The] Confederacy respected law above all things." ~ Shelby Foote[/i]
What a crock.

Confederate flag is the battle flag of a war in support of slavery. It is indeed a symbol of racism.

Confederacy respect the law? Who are you trying to kid?

The war itself was illegal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
182 posts, read 264,306 times
Reputation: 202
The powers that be at the time in the North and South were complicit in slavery and when the Northern industrialists decided to replace their black slaves with child labor in the early 1800's, they sold them to the South instead of setting them free. There were also a lot of slaves that came through ports in the North. Both sides are guilty of the sin of slavery, which is why the whole Unites States apologized for it in the 1950's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:24 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094
"I have no purpose, directly or in-directly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so," Lincoln said it his first inaugural on March 4 of the same year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:24 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gentleman Jason View Post
The powers that be at the time were complicit in slavery and when the Northern industrialists decided to replace their black slaves with child labor in the early 1800's, they sold them to the South instead of setting them free. There were also a lot of slaves that came through ports in the North. Both sides are guilty of the sin of slavery, which is why the whole Unites States apologized for it in the 1950's
But only one side is guilty of trying to tear apart the U.S.A. in support of slavery.

That's the reason these statues need to be moved and the Confederate flag needs to come down from public property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2017, 09:25 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
"I have no purpose, directly or in-directly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so," Lincoln said it his first inaugural on March 4 of the same year.
He did, however, have a strong commitment to keeping the union together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top