Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Per the Daily Caller, the author, when it was pointed out his article did not mention the Senator was a Democrat, basically said "****, you're right; I'll change that" then he did without complaint.
The author (who represented himself, not the NYT as a whole... but nuance is only a gift bestowed to those who vote the same way you do, I'm sure) most likely is a Democrat and therefore his own biased probably lead him to omitting the detail. Given his response, it most likely wasn't intentional. But it's the NYTs so we have to complain, right? It doesn't matter that every detail of the story was fine. What matters is the NYT didn't add "**** Democrats" like reputable news sources would, such as the Daily Caller or Breitbart.
It's from the Daily Caller, so yeah. This is an understatement.
I'm guessing the NYT is supposed to double down on their error and pretend it was part of some plot. You know, like Trump did with 'covfefe.' Equally trivial and both the result of a minor error, but when you read the Daily Caller, the freedom to err is only given to those who are part of the right totalitarian ideology.
Per the Daily Caller, the author, when it was pointed out his article did not mention the Senator was a Democrat, basically said "****, you're right; I'll change that" then he did without complaint.
The author (who represented himself, not the NYT as a whole... but nuance is only a gift bestowed to those who vote the same way you do, I'm sure) most likely is a Democrat and therefore his own biased probably lead him to omitting the detail. Given his response, it most likely wasn't intentional. But it's the NYTs so we have to complain, right? It doesn't matter that every detail of the story was fine. What matters is the NYT didn't add "**** Democrats" like reputable news sources would, such as the Daily Caller or Breitbart.
I have a bridge for sale. It's a really nice bridge. Would you like to know more?
Per the Daily Caller, the author, when it was pointed out his article did not mention the Senator was a Democrat, basically said "****, you're right; I'll change that" then he did without complaint.
The author (who represented himself, not the NYT as a whole... but nuance is only a gift bestowed to those who vote the same way you do, I'm sure) most likely is a Democrat and therefore his own biased probably lead him to omitting the detail. Given his response, it most likely wasn't intentional. But it's the NYTs so we have to complain, right? It doesn't matter that every detail of the story was fine. What matters is the NYT didn't add "**** Democrats" like reputable news sources would, such as the Daily Caller or Breitbart.
Nothing happens in a vacuum, Dusty.
But you knew that.....lol
The lamestream media are completely and utterly discredited.
Still protecting their own. Can't imagine this happening if the perp was a Republican.
Yet there are still a few fools who believe everything they read in this tabloid and that it isn't biased. Old habits die hard I guess.
Strange that the Cons here know more of what the NYT and CNN are saying than most Libs here, yet it is they that claim it is all fake news but obviously cannot stop watching it. Kinda Bizarre if you ask me
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
