Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-12-2017, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,607,170 times
Reputation: 29385

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
I don't. I say we give them the pay they deserve. A well deserved living wage for honest work.
By 'living wage' I'm assuming you mean a wage a person can afford to live on?

Not every job is geared toward that and if you're going to start paying a livable income to people washing hair in a salon other salaries will have to go up in turn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-12-2017, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,737,754 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox Terrier View Post
interesting that the poverty rate has stayed the same even though the number of unwed women giving birth has risen dramatically according to the video.

to go from 34 percent poverty to 17 percent shows that welfare and other programs have worked.
You should watch the video again. The reduction from 34% to 17% happened BEFORE welfare programs were implemented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2017, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Metro NYC
696 posts, read 906,729 times
Reputation: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
When did the dems end the war on drugs?
Yeah thats what I thought
I never said they did. My point was that more ramping up occurred on the GOPs watch than the Dems. And it was Reagan who went to town with asset forfeiture abuse. If you are a conservative, that should make your blood boil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2017, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,737,754 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonetlumiere View Post
I never said they did. My point was that more ramping up occurred on the GOPs watch than the Dems.
Not quite.

1937: FDR got us started with the Marihuana Tax Act.

1951: Boggs (D-La) introduced the bill to ramp up prison sentences and made them mandatory.

1956: Dems in control of House and Senate pass law increasing penalties including 2 - 10 years for first possession.

1968: LBJ creates Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.

1970: Dems in control of both House and Senate pass Controlled Substances Act which says marijuana has "No accepted medical use".

2008 - 2016: Obama refuses to remove marijuana from Schedule I and publicly states that he opposes legalization.

Sorry, but the Dems are at least as guilty as Reps in this sordid history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2017, 05:56 PM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,455,334 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
By 'living wage' I'm assuming you mean a wage a person can afford to live on?
Yes, of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2017, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
1,548 posts, read 913,188 times
Reputation: 1413
Thanks once again, feminists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2017, 06:30 PM
 
7,934 posts, read 8,591,003 times
Reputation: 5889
Quote:
Originally Posted by blanker View Post
Thanks once again, feminists.
Yeah, I'm going to have to play it safe on this one and just blame it on women. You're right at least 80% of the time when you go that route lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2017, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Avignon, France
11,159 posts, read 7,961,718 times
Reputation: 28965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
^^^^^I was reminded of this when an on scene reporter was interviewing a fleeing woman with her several month old baby from Hurricane Irma. She said she was devastated because her, and her "BOYFRIEND" were supposed to get married at the end of the month. Well why weren't they married BEFORE they had children, or at lease while she was pregnant? So many couples are doing this backwards today, or not at all. She was White, by the way.

Wouldn't it be nice if that little piece of paper guaranteed that people would live up to the responsibilities of having and raising their children. Unfortunately.... it doesn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top