Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:07 AM
 
13,899 posts, read 6,402,705 times
Reputation: 6960

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
that doesn't sound accurate. cite the law for us.
It's not accurate. It's a lie. The government can undo anything that it does. It's preposterous to think they can't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:08 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,285 posts, read 54,100,737 times
Reputation: 40586
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
There should be no "Federal lands" except what is needed for military bases. The rest should belong to the States.

WHY? Based on what? Why should the military have a privilege accorded to no one else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:11 AM
 
34,301 posts, read 15,548,776 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchoc View Post
The ONLY reason Trump wants to destroy this heritage of the American people is because Obama and/or Democrats established them.
Not the best possible reason but acceptable.

Obama and his postage stamp legacy. I like it !!!!!!!! Can I get a "Promote that Guy" ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:12 AM
 
46,839 posts, read 25,771,071 times
Reputation: 29319
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
Were you mad when other presidents did the same? Like when Obama shrank Bears Ears for the uranium mines?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason3000 View Post
So what? Bears Ears was just named a National Monument, against the will of the people of Utah by an executive order by Obama on his way out the door. Better to let the people of Utah decide these things.
Do you two need a minute to compare notes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:13 AM
 
13,899 posts, read 6,402,705 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
WHY? Based on what? Why should the military have a privilege accorded to no one else?
lmao..Aren't you arguing FOR the Feds to keep land in this thread? Make up your mind already. Do the Feds get to take land away from people or not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:13 AM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,603,540 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
What difference does it make ?

The left has destroyed statues illegally. One is legal and the other not. The Lincoln and Washing monuments have been targeted also.

The "Statue of Liberty" is a national monument. It is listed among the other 128 monuments, some of which include buildings and statues.

Headline by the NYT says they are monuments. Not national monuments.

Confederate Monuments Are Coming Down
Across the United States.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...s-removed.html
whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism whataboutism


in short your whataboutism is just noise, intended to obscure signal and nothing more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,808 posts, read 26,339,320 times
Reputation: 25697
You mean the Trump administration is actually listening to the people that live near and are impacted by the monument designation? Oh, the horror!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:18 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,285 posts, read 54,100,737 times
Reputation: 40586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
lmao..Aren't you arguing FOR the Feds to keep land in this thread? Make up your mind already. Do the Feds get to take land away from people or not?

I asked WHY should ONLY the military have the right to Federal lands? Sorry if you're incapable of understanding the simple concept of more than one agency also controlling Federal lands.

And just so you understand, designating lands that are already Federal lands as National Monuments IS NOT taking land away from people no matter what your imagination may tell you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:29 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,044,740 times
Reputation: 2814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
Which people of Utah? The ones who were originally there, or the ones who took it from them? Or the ones who now want to turn it into oil fields?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-interior-monument-tribes/navajo-tribe-says-ready-to-sue-trump-over-changes-to-utah-monument-idUSKCN1BW2W0
Just wondering if you live in the United States do you own a home or any land?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 11:32 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,365 posts, read 17,045,178 times
Reputation: 17404
The states must be po'ed that the feds are returning state land to their control.


Clinton created or expanded 19 NMs
Obama created or expanded 34 Nms


there are 129 established natl monuments


Trump is looking only those established in the last 21 years.... mid Clinton administration


Hey, libs, if you like your natl monuments you can keep your natl monuments!


No distinction can be made between excessive and intelligent decisions by the liberal mind. All or nothing at all, no compromise, no debate.


Wiki.....


"The Trump Administration today issued an Executive Order that commands the Department of Interior to examine the Antiquities Act and national monuments designated over the last 21 years. The stated goal of the Executive Order is to determine whether the national monuments comply with the intent of the Antiquities Act—the law that allows presidents to proclaim national monuments without the consent of Congress. "
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top