Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Good point brought up --- Manafort was under investigation for a few years. Did he fail to tell the Trump administration? (The person stating this implied Manafort knew). The person was saying how unfair it was to Trump if Manafort signed on to the campaign knowing all of this. I agree.
This is an interesting question.
Did Manafort withhold this information and if so, why become officially attached to the campaign under those circumstances?
I dont suppose any of you folks noticed that Manafort was being listened to starting in 2014? You know...years before he joined Trumps campaign?
This wasn't about politics folks. This was about treason.
It's been well over a year since the witch hunt about "Russian collusion" started and there still isn't a single piece of evidence proving it, or anything close to it.
And of course, you ignore the fact that Obama's corrupt cronies explicitly and repeatedly lied about this. You don't mind lying when it furthers the left's agenda, do you? Just admit it.
This is not about Trump screaming and tweeting hysterically that he was wiretapped. Manafort was already under investigation. The brainiacs in the Trump campaign having no judgment whatsoever simply decided to hire someone who was known to be a shady character. They knew this, but did not care as they have no problem working with shady characters.
It is being reported that he was told he is being indicted when they raided Manafort's home. This is usually when they start talking.
If my friend's phone is tapped and my conversations with my friend are illicitly recorded, then I've been tapped.
You seem to be one of those folks that accepted Bill Clinton's argument about what the definition of "is" is.
The clue is your use of the "illicitly "....since there was a legal warrant...the recording was licit.
Trump was not the subject of the recording..therfore he was not 'tapped. ..as there was no intent to tap him.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.