Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-22-2018, 10:26 AM
 
1,348 posts, read 791,557 times
Reputation: 1615

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeliner View Post
What's so untrue?

Many people with chronic preexisting medical conditions had no actual access to healthcare other than a hospital's ER services. I would NOT call THAT real access to practical healthcare...

What could an ER do for a cancer patient?

What could an ER do for a lupus or MS patient?

Some patients need expensive operations or long-term hospitalization. What could an ER do for them?

Hospitals have been known to turn patients away in desperate need of medical attention due to lack of "proper" financial coverage...
You have absolutely NO CLUE what you're talking about and should get off the internet until you do.

You don't even live in America, do you? Or you're 15 years old. You've now proven that you like to spread FALSE information.

In 1986, Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure public access to emergency services regardless of ability to pay.
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-...lation/EMTALA/

Whatever you reply back, I'm not going to engage with you. You've shown your false hand.
Do America a favor and get off the internet until you've grown-up and are working with FACTS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2018, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,692,117 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travel Crazy View Post
You have absolutely NO CLUE what you're talking about and should get off the internet until you do.

You don't even live in America, do you? Or you're 15 years old. You've now proven that you like to spread FALSE information.

In 1986, Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure public access to emergency services regardless of ability to pay.
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-...lation/EMTALA/

Whatever you reply back, I'm not going to engage with you. You've shown your false hand.
Do America a favor and get off the internet until you've grown-up and are working with FACTS.
Did you read your link?

EMERGENCY services.

Not long term maintenance care for chronic conditions like diabetes or asthma or cancer.
You know, pre-existing conditions.


That poster is absolutely correct.

You are the one spreading false information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 11:07 AM
 
13,602 posts, read 4,926,293 times
Reputation: 9687
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
You need to include the cost of insurance via your taxes. The $37.50 you pay is likely for a private policy to cover prescriptions, dental, or long term care not covered by your national healthcare.
There's no free lunch, as they say, and certainly citizens of countries like Canada pay for their "free" medical care through taxes. The difference is, having it administered by the government means that medical care can be universal. Unlike in the US, where the wealthy get the best care money can buy, while the poor get little or none.

ACA tried to address that, and was successful to a degree. Republicans swore up and down to repeal and replace ACA, but failed because they couldn't come up with a decent replacement (as Donald once said, "who knew healthcare was so complicated?"). Instead, we have executive orders that are undermining the pillars of ACA which will leave a vacuum.

For example, the individual mandate was intended to force healthy people to buy insurance to offset the cost of insuring unhealthy people. Take away the first part of that and the second part collapses. We are seeing that now with Trump's proposal to remove the requirement to insure pre-existing conditions. The alternative is higher rates, which we are also seeing. So thank the GOP for this mess; they own it now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 11:29 AM
 
292 posts, read 244,756 times
Reputation: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by LGR_NYR View Post
United healthcare Cadillac plan in NYC/NYS for my Son and So on her employee plan may go up 11%. Her plan costs in total $21000 a year now. It has gone up every year since the ACA went into effect. Her plan used to be $4500 a year for just her. Than $6000 a year then it went crazy. She pays roughly $8000 a year towards her plan. I had United Healthcare through the state exchange and it was costing me $800 s month. My Dr. stopped taking it so I had to switch to Empire Ble Cross/Blue Shield. It's a little cheaper but I am getting less and I am paying more out of pocket. Between the two of us, our plans cost over $30,000 a year. How is that possible? How is that affordable??
It's called the one of the biggest redistribution of wealth in recent history- to people who will not ( are able to stash a lot of their income under the table thru various measures, or are paid totally in cash, such as those who work as a domestic..nannies, housekeepers, gardeners, etc...certain areas of the construction trade, etc.) or can not pay for a catastrophic health plan.

The actual people who are poverty level or below-fine, no problem helping those folks...but the rest who play the system...tough luck, pay in like everyone else has to.....but they are a protected class for some reason....many times they are illegals who have done nothing to pursue citizenship...one of the reasons is the low cost or free healthcare. And they are making well above US poverty standards in their jobs.

This has also been a big profit maker for the insurance companies, do not kid yourself...31k a year for two people with a high deductible?

They have always wanted this to head into a single payor plan. But you can bet the family farm that the US plan will certainly make the Canadian plan look like a a Cadillac policy next to what Americans will receive.

Noteworthy:In a single payer system..they determine what care you receive...they even determine what care you can pursue out of pocket....not on their plan or formularies? You are completely unable to access it.

So if grandpa wants and needs a hip replacement at 76 and is in sound mind and a health body... he still can be denied coverage based on age.

But what if grandpa wants to travel and pay out of pocket? In certain communist and socialist countries it is against the law. People do it anyways....but you will receive no further medical care should you have further complications once you return home. You are on your own for further upkeep of said hip replacement, since it was never approved under your socialized medical plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 11:31 AM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,356,098 times
Reputation: 22904
My plan for healthcare was and is to continue with an employer-subsidized plan. Our family premium did go up this year but not as much as the OP suggested was a possibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 11:35 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,179,016 times
Reputation: 18824
Our healthcare plan has went up about 3%-5% every single year for the last 20 years. One year it shot up 7%.

I don’t even pay it any mind anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
4 posts, read 4,244 times
Reputation: 22
My husband and I decided to go the "healthshare" route. We chose Liberty Health Share but there are others. We are happy with it so far (signed up a year ago) and it only costs us a little over $200 a month (for both of us) which is a huge difference in what we were paying before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top