Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-09-2017, 02:03 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,724,715 times
Reputation: 13868

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
Anyone who wastes their life not preparing for this is to blame. Oh well...
True, they they may be to blame but sometimes their kids suffer the consequence especially if the parent(s) get sick. Ask anyone who's part of the sandwich generation taking care of their own kids and their parents because their parents only source of income is a small SS and pension and they can't afford to pay for help. Either the kids help physically and while their trying to put money aside for their own retirement are also helping the parents financially or even both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2017, 02:07 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,724,715 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
Majority of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck and that is by design


Every job being done right now by someone needs to be done and is not being done for make busy work.

If there are 100 million jobs filled and they were ranked by pay, someone has to do each one of those jobs so if everyone had more skills and moved up in rank, who is going to do the jobs below them?

Having everyone move up in rank would just decrease the wages higher up since there are more people at higher ranks (supply and demand)

The system is run with this in mind where the majority of the people no matter how many skills they have, will be paid what they are being paid now and the top ranks will reap the benefits from this.

A person at the low ranks today has more technical skills than a simple factory worker was in 1980 and is paid less than they were in 1980.


This is how the system is designed, where the top ranks take the lions share of the wealth and everyone below them take less
Our schools (who don't encourage individuality) teach the people how to work for someone else instead of working for yourself or how to run a business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Tampa, FL
388 posts, read 535,889 times
Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
The Rent Eats First.
And apparently so does the storage unit of your porn mags...
Where you spend over a hundred $ a month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2017, 10:18 AM
 
8,011 posts, read 8,204,319 times
Reputation: 12159
Quote:
Originally Posted by westender View Post
I've long known about the smattering of 60+ people who still have to work and who resent those who have successfully retired at the same age. What's new to me is the Grasshopper-syndrome millennials. Younger people in their 20s and 30s, resentful of those of us who scrimped and saved for decades and are now comfortably well-to-do.

I hear it all the time: some 20-something guy complaining that he cannot afford a house in {Austin, Boulder, San Francisco, Boston}, and further that he resents his elders who are retired and self-funded.

Sorry buttercups. Every American should expect to work and save for 40+ years. Your elders all commuted from far-flung locales for years. We worked overtime and watched our pennies. There is no right to live in an expensive hipster neighborhood fiddling with overpriced Apple gadgets nor any reason for someone under 50 to feed at the public trough.
Really? so the result of all of these elders toiling away and saving is most of you living off of Social Security which is currently being subsidized by the working 20-something year old "entitled" hipsters? FOH. Such a lack of gratitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2017, 10:33 AM
 
Location: The ends DO NOT justify the means!!!
4,783 posts, read 3,741,180 times
Reputation: 1336
Maybe this is because children have somehow forgotten their duty to their parents that people used to understand before the fictional collective ideology took over. Knowing this, it is necessary to continually invest about 30% of one's income into the market so that one can retire and receive the same dividends that their average salary produced while working in inflation adjusted dollars. This is if you want to "earn" as much in retirement in real purchasing power as you had while working If you can't save that much, then your retirement will need to cut your living expenses drastically. (Assuming a 6% average return and 3% average inflation over your lifetime.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2017, 10:36 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,002,303 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suburban_Guy View Post
Certainly not a new topic, but the latest article on the sobering reality facing many older Americans and those about to join that demographic in the future.

Our country doesn't value old age, instead it considers them washed up and left to fend for themselves in favor of youth.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...al-insecurity/
My husband turned 60 this year and is still working. We've had this discussion so many times. How do Americans retire?

Our Canadian peers -- some have been retired for a few years. They have their primary residence, a cottage in Canada and enjoy winters in sunny places -- either because they own another home or just rent for a few months. They travel to far off places and don't seem to be concerned about their health care costs, etc.

We all are of similar economic status -- family size, etc....but retirement in the USA is scary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2017, 11:23 AM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,798,537 times
Reputation: 4381
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
My husband turned 60 this year and is still working. We've had this discussion so many times. How do Americans retire?

Our Canadian peers -- some have been retired for a few years. They have their primary residence, a cottage in Canada and enjoy winters in sunny places -- either because they own another home or just rent for a few months. They travel to far off places and don't seem to be concerned about their health care costs, etc.

We all are of similar economic status -- family size, etc....but retirement in the USA is scary.
It is all by design the top 1 percenters and corporate America want a very small group of haves, and a very large group of have nots.

They want the masses locked into a paycheck to paycheck slave to the grind lifestyle... combined with a cost of living that is spiraling out of control.

They want people to never be able to retire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2017, 11:26 AM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,560 posts, read 17,267,108 times
Reputation: 37273
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderlust76 View Post
It is all by design the top 1 percenters and corporate America want a very small group of haves, and a very large group of have nots.

They want the masses locked into a paycheck to paycheck slave to the grind lifestyle... combined with a cost of living that is spiraling out of control.
Your comment is more appealing to a therapist than anyone else.
There is no "they".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2017, 11:44 AM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,633,838 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Our schools (who don't encourage individuality) teach the people how to work for someone else instead of working for yourself or how to run a business.
most folk don't do well being self employed.

It is not a US thing, it is a HUMAN thing. we can't all lead , we can't all be the person with a big idea or a work ethic bordering on a disorder.

if 100 poeple live in my tiny nation.. and i open a factory that needs 80 employees, i am screwed if 25% of the pop is self employed...

we need most people to work for others until bots are flexible , reliable and cheap.... so the schools are doing the right thing. We would have a lot of disappointed people if we trained kids to think about making their own jobs rather than training to get a good job working for someone or something else...

you can be creative, valuable and have a fulfilling career being an employee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2017, 11:44 AM
 
3,617 posts, read 3,882,494 times
Reputation: 2295
Unless this guy has less than 35 years of work under his belt (social security averages your 35 highest years of earnings, less than that is a 0 averaged in) or has unusually high expenses he now qualifies for enhanced social security payments as he is over 70 and can probably safely retire on that alone. A few extra years of reduced expenses and a 32% increased benefit go a long way.

If you delay SS till 70 and work a full career (or are married to someone who did), then under current law it really is sufficient to live on alone. I wouldn't suggest a 20-something do that because the program is unsustainable over the long term and assuming no cuts to future beneficiaries in the next 50 years is not safe, but for someone already 70+ they will be fine.

edit: formula here https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10070.pdf if you are interested, 8% a year for going beyond full retirement age up to 70. Reading the article the person being discussed did not wait till 70 to claim despite the fact that they were working and didn't have sufficient savings, and then either he didn't work a full career or was just very unsuccessful throughout his entire working life to get so little ($22K) despite the 50% spousal bump. Self-inflicted harm and kind of cherry picked by the article writer to make a point.

Last edited by ALackOfCreativity; 11-19-2017 at 12:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top