Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-08-2017, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,483,709 times
Reputation: 9618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
$6T over what time frame?

300M people won't all use $10K of HC services a year. $10K is a typical Medicare, older patient and probably with chronic disease.

And that is $3T.
30 million americans BELOW THE AGE of 60 have diabeties......total annual cost 578 billion......with the annual average cost EACH at 18k to 25k

number of americans getting cancer (new cases) per year 1.9 million for a total of 25 million people being treated (fighting) each year...each year at least 570,000 die from cancer....the cost is over 250 billion annually. and expected to be 290 billion by 2020.....


number of americans in full pledged nursing homes: (NOT COVERED BY MEDICARE)
2.5 million...... the average cost Adult Day Health Care,.20,000 per year......
assisted living facility 45,000 per year....
nursing home (semi-private room),.85,000 per year.......
nursing home (private room),.96,000
number of americans in all levels of nursing homes and assisted living....over 12 million (Annually 12,595,100 people receive support from the 5 main long-term care service; home health agencies (5,942,500), nursing homes (2,683,700), hospices (1,744,500), residential care communities (1,113,300) and adult day service centers (393,200)...............ANNUAL total cost of long term care 690 billion annually...and going up every year


More than 27 million Americans have significant vision loss.((a total of 87 million Americans have potentially blinding eye diseases. )) (((hmmm more than 27 million americans are blind or going blind.....that's more than Norway, Finland, Denmark, Switzerland, and Austria COMBINED TOTAL population....)))......The ANNUAL cost of vision loss, including direct costs and lost productivity, is estimated to exceed $151 billion


number of americans with asthma: 27 million....Each day 11 Americans die from asthma.......annual costs 96 billion per year and increasing....


that's over 120 million people with serious health risks..while some may overlap..its still a good one third of the country
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-08-2017, 09:51 PM
 
8,148 posts, read 3,676,088 times
Reputation: 2718
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
gonna cost a LOT MORE than that

UHC or medicare for all will cost AT LEAST 3 trillion additional..and it includes copays

singlepayer or more like Medicaid 100% coverage...will cost nearly 6 trillion

our current population is 326 million....was 325 million back in july.... https://www.census.gov/popclock/ this does not include those not documented

less than half the country earns any income to even be taxed....slightly more than half of those even pay federal taxes
Lol, sure it will. Medicare currently is CHEAPER per person than an equivalent private insurance is ever going to be. The END.

My 10 and 8 year olds understand numbers, do you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 09:57 PM
 
9,742 posts, read 4,495,432 times
Reputation: 3981
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
https://www.sanders.senate.gov/downl...=1&inline=file

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...tes/105971268/

I guess under the Medicare for all plan the total FICA tax would from 15% to 26%.

The employees share would go to 11.65% and the employers share would go to 14.65%.

The additional taxes would raise 700 billion dollars per year.
Wait? Are you quoting "fake news" cites? Say it is no so. If you do this time then you have to back their veracity before and after this time. Or have a damn reason not to. I've read enuff or your posts to claim fake news. Now you are citing them as not fake news. You turn to explain the sudden change o religion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 11:36 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,483,709 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
Lol, sure it will. Medicare currently is CHEAPER per person than an equivalent private insurance is ever going to be. The END.

My 10 and 8 year olds understand numbers, do you?
no doubt your kids understand numbers...the question is do you

medicare PARTIALLY covers about 44 million seniors...and the cost....

let's look at the increases medicare has cost:
in 2000 medicare was 216 billion
in 2008 medicare was 456 billion
in 2016 medicare was 691 billion


Medicaid:
2000.....117 billion
2008.....201 billion
2016.....368 billion

what is even more interesting is what the predicted outlays will be in the future
in 2016 medicare was 691 billion
prediction for 2020....963 billion
prediction for 2026....1.383 Trillion

actual Medicaid 2016.....368 billion
prediction for 2020....450 billion
prediction for 2026....616 Billion



again

if the estimate for FY2026 is 1.3 trillion to PARTIALLY cover 44 million with medicare AND if the estimate for FY2026 is 2/3 trillion to PARTIALLY cover about 40 million with medicaid ...what do YOU THINK the cost would be for 325 million people?????

so let's see...OUR OWN GOVERNMENTs estimate is 2 trillion to cover 85ish million people....yes they are the most expensive bunch...so let's cut that in half...still 255 million left...at 1 trillion per 80...that's still another 3.17 trillion...so the cost would be about 5 trillion

...what do YOU THINK the cost would be for 340 million people?????

Last edited by workingclasshero; 10-09-2017 at 12:01 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 11:50 PM
 
Location: Alaska
7,502 posts, read 5,752,205 times
Reputation: 4885
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Hell no, Because that means no Medicare or Medicaid. F that!
Hell no! That means people would have to get educations or learn a trade and get a good paying job verses everyone else paying for mama's 5 kids to different baby daddy's! I had it up to my eyeballs with lazy asses. We have duty to help mentally and physically challenged people. I should have NO obligation to pay for someone that drops kids like rain drops because she can't keep her legs together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2017, 12:58 AM
 
Location: Arizona
6,137 posts, read 3,864,079 times
Reputation: 4900
Reimbursement rates are far lower for Medicare then Commercial insurance companies.

https://www.ahip.org/wp-content/uplo...on_2.10.16.pdf

https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-i...are-fee-index/

Medicaid reimburses below Medicare in vast majority of states.

It costs more than $10,000 per year for the average person on Medicare but they shift the losses onto commercial insurance.

If they reimbursed at cost they would spend more per person, but the federal government shifts the costs onto commercial insurance providers which is a tax on employers and employees.

From articles I have read both Medicare and Medicaid tend to pay below cost, so it made when they negotiate with the commercial insurance providers.

I am all for Medicare and Medicaid but Medicare should reimburse at cost and states need to pay more of the costs of Medicaid rather then 90%+ for ACA elgibles, there is no reason they can't do traditional match and let the states raise taxes accordingly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2017, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
https://www.sanders.senate.gov/downl...=1&inline=file

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...tes/105971268/

I guess under the Medicare for all plan the total FICA tax would from 15% to 26%.

The employees share would go to 11.65% and the employers share would go to 14.65%.

The additional taxes would raise 700 billion dollars per year.
So, for someone making $50K, it would mean an additional $2000 in taxes, while not paying for health care costs, which are claimed to be $10K per person. That's $8 000 in savings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2017, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackwinkelman View Post
Ok well they will just have to fire 20% of their staff to afford it. All business owners are not raking in massive amounts of cash. The ignorance of the far left.
Why would they have to fire people? Currently they pay for their employees health insurance, which is actually much more than the new tax would be. It would save them money, not cost more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2017, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
In a 2016 report on his presidential campaign's "Medicare for All" plan, the Urban Institute (left wing think tank) estimated that the plan would cost $32 trillion over 10 years, or 3.2 trillion per year (with costs going up with inflation every year)
Most of which is already being collected through our current tax system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2017, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,604,784 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossfire600 View Post
Hell no! That means people would have to get educations or learn a trade and get a good paying job verses everyone else paying for mama's 5 kids to different baby daddy's! I had it up to my eyeballs with lazy asses. We have duty to help mentally and physically challenged people. I should have NO obligation to pay for someone that drops kids like rain drops because she can't keep her legs together.

Medicare only covers seniors, and a lot of seniors use Medicaid in addition (to pay for nursing homes). What do you have against senior citizens, or do you think they should magically have saved millions of dollars by retirement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top