Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:48 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,597,559 times
Reputation: 14988

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Does the Second Amendment define arms? Why not rocket launchers? And does the 2nd Amendment discriminate against the mentally ill? Should all the mentally ill have equal rights to weapons? Why not?
I love it when a liberal gun-hater loses the argument so completely. They immediately change the subject and try to direct the conversation to limiting other things instead.

Only took a page and a half of the thread this time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:48 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,603,454 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Perhaps the guns should be limited to what was available in 1787, the year the constitution was signed.
People could own slaves then too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:49 PM
 
Location: PSL
8,224 posts, read 3,494,176 times
Reputation: 2963
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
One pump action shotgun, one bolt action 30.06 (or similar), maybe a single shot .22. That's enough. With a shotgun, rifle and four wheel drive, a country boy can survive.
https://youtu.be/LT4YjbVv4ss
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,929,539 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corvette Ministries View Post
The venerable Second Amendment to the US Constitution ensures the citizens' right to keep and bear arms.

But how many arms? Two? Six? Twenty? 48? 600?

If Congress decided to strip Americans of all arms but two, how would 2nd Am advocates justify their "right" to bear an unlimited amount of arms?
Not giving up Squat, neither should anyone else. Done.............................
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:49 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,820,716 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Perhaps the guns should be limited to what was available in 1787, the year the constitution was signed.
then lets do something stupid and limit EVERYTHING to what was available in 1787, like no more computers, no aircraft, hot air balloons are ok though, no cars, only horses and trains of the steam engine variety, no telephones, not even a telegraph. no more roads, houses built with anything other than wood, no electricity, no water heaters, only wood burning stoves, no television, no cds, no dvds, no tape players, etc.

also no supermarkets, you buy everything you need from individual stores, so you go to the meat market to get your meat, and the general store to get most everything else. no hospitals, no antibiotics, in fact few drugs of any kind. doctors made house calls, wooden sailing ships, etc. just how much re you really willing to give up to go back to 1787?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:50 PM
 
Location: PSL
8,224 posts, read 3,494,176 times
Reputation: 2963
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
People could own slaves then too.
Oh the jokes write themselves...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:51 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,948,920 times
Reputation: 8114
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Perhaps the guns should be limited to what was available in 1787, the year the constitution was signed.

Perhaps there should be a prize awarded for ignorance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:51 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,597,559 times
Reputation: 14988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
One pump action shotgun, one bolt action 30.06 (or similar), maybe a single shot .22. That's enough. With a shotgun, rifle and four wheel drive, a country boy can survive.
It's especially entertaining when these government-uber-alles types start telling others that the big-govt type knows better than they do, what they need and/or can get along with.

The arrogance and condescension of the liberals approaches hubris levels sometimes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:54 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,212,564 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
I know a guy who must have at least 50 guns, all the way from muzzle-loaders, to assault weapons. But he's lost about 2/3 of his hearing------the muzzle-loaders are the worst for that problem. He's never hunted or had any experience with guns out in the field and it's not clear why he wants to have them. Three of his brothers, who've never hunted or been in combat, have also had many guns.

My personal observations, are that many of the people who seem most obsessed with owning large collections of guns, are those who have never had military service, been in law-enforcement or have been hunters. They've never seen first-hand, the destruction and tragedy guns can cause, in the wrong hands. And they may be trying to make up for their lack of service, in their own minds, by surrounding themselves with a lot of armament. Most of them are untrained and don't know what they're doing.
Navy vet here selling legal machineguns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 04:59 PM
 
Location: San Diego
5,733 posts, read 4,688,017 times
Reputation: 12791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
I know a guy who must have at least 50 guns, all the way from muzzle-loaders, to assault weapons. But he's lost about 2/3 of his hearing------the muzzle-loaders are the worst for that problem. He's never hunted or had any experience with guns out in the field and it's not clear why he wants to have them. Three of his brothers, who've never hunted or been in combat, have also had many guns.

My personal observations, are that many of the people who seem most obsessed with owning large collections of guns, are those who have never had military service, been in law-enforcement or have been hunters. They've never seen first-hand, the destruction and tragedy guns can cause, in the wrong hands. And they may be trying to make up for their lack of service, in their own minds, by surrounding themselves with a lot of armament. Most of them are untrained and don't know what they're doing. Maybe the guns are phallic symbols or substitutes for them.
Exactly why we need the "Save our Hearing" Act passed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top