Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-16-2008, 11:45 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,571,500 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Environmental Protection Agency agreed to weaken an important part of its new smog requirements after being told at the last minute that President Bush preferred a less stringent approach, according to government documents.

Documents: Bush asked for weaker smog standard - CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/14/dirty.air.ap/index.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-17-2008, 03:33 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,326 posts, read 54,344,425 times
Reputation: 40721
If there's one thing GWB has excelled at it's lowering standards and expectations
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2008, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Albemarle, NC
7,730 posts, read 14,151,834 times
Reputation: 1520
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
If there's one thing GWB has excelled at it's lowering standards and expectations
Lowest common denominator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2008, 03:38 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,326 posts, read 54,344,425 times
Reputation: 40721
Quote:
Originally Posted by paperhouse View Post
Lowest common denominator.


If he could say that 3 times fast I mighta voted for him
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2008, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,206,341 times
Reputation: 7373
The issue is much more complex than presented, it has to do with the air standards in rural areas, and the tradeoffs with farming and biofuel production. The decision was to make a single common standard, using the human health standards.


The new primary 8-hour standard is 0.075 parts per million (ppm) and the new secondary standard is set at a form and level identical to the primary standard. The previous primary and secondary standards were identical 8-hour standards, set at 0.08 ppm. Because ozone is measured out to three decimal places, the standard effectively became 0.084 ppm: areas with ozone levels as high as 0.084 ppm were considered as meeting the 0.08 ppm standard, because of rounding.

EPA Strengthens Smog Standards to Better Protect Human Health and the Environment | Newsroom | US EPA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top