Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-07-2017, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Southern Nevada
6,746 posts, read 3,361,971 times
Reputation: 10356

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
The seats are tandem and someone sits behind you with their hands around you on top of your hands!! Just watch your popcorn.

Imagine the possibilities if they were watching porn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-07-2017, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Houston
5,993 posts, read 3,731,537 times
Reputation: 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
I think the number of people requesting this is going to be very low. Most people are probably not going to want to pay the price of a movie ticket when they're both legally deaf and blind because there's no benefit in doing that. The only reason people go to the movies now is they either have to be the first to say they saw a movie or to get the big-screen big-sound they can't get at home. Since legally blind and deaf people can't benefit from the latter, only the former would compel them to make such a request.

This may have even been one of those lawsuits filed just to force an issue.

I think you're getting upset about nothing, particularly if you prefer to watch movies at home.
Yeah but then the OP wouldn't get to blow something way out of proportion like he did and be outraged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,595,087 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie View Post
Yeah but then the OP wouldn't get to blow something way out of proportion like he did and be outraged.
In defense of Claymoore, I don't think he engages in much of that. As for the rest of the posters, I'm assuming they're thinking in term of possibility versus probability.

And you have to admit, we all come here so we can express our outrage, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Houston
5,993 posts, read 3,731,537 times
Reputation: 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
In defense of Claymoore, I don't think he engages in much of that. As for the rest of the posters, I'm assuming they're thinking in term of possibility versus probability.

And you have to admit, we all come here so we can express our outrage, right?
That we do, sir...that we do!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 04:52 PM
 
3,106 posts, read 1,768,194 times
Reputation: 4558
Even with 24 hours notice such as someone suggested, I would venture to guess that even finding a tactile interpreter in many small towns in rural areas would be extremely difficult, and even then the tactile interpreter needs to be available when the movie goer wants to go. The request is ludicrous. Life is unfair. There are limits to what can be accommodated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 04:56 PM
 
Location: So Cal
10,028 posts, read 9,500,216 times
Reputation: 10449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
He ought to invest in his own tactile interpreter so he can watch tv as well.
Probably sue the cable / satellite companies demanding a live-in interpreter so he can watch TV so to speak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2017, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,352 posts, read 6,521,770 times
Reputation: 5169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biker53 View Post
Even with 24 hours notice such as someone suggested, I would venture to guess that even finding a tactile interpreter in many small towns in rural areas would be extremely difficult, and even then the tactile interpreter needs to be available when the movie goer wants to go. The request is ludicrous. Life is unfair. There are limits to what can be accommodated.
My point by that post was that a requirement to call ahead would be reasonable. For a big city 24 hours may be the acceptable, but for a smaller city, I could see it still being reasonable to require a longer period of time, like 2-3 days, even a week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 07:30 AM
 
4,534 posts, read 4,927,812 times
Reputation: 6327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
Imagine the possibilities if they were watching porn.
I just lost my coffee through my nose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 07:39 AM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,156 posts, read 12,951,087 times
Reputation: 33179
Quote:
Originally Posted by skycaller23 View Post
The price of tickets will go up if theaters have to have interpreters "on call" just in case.
They wouldn't have to have them on call. They would only need to use them if a both blind and deaf patron came to the movies, which rarely happens. This is an odd request however, and I think Cinemark will win. The thing I found most shocking about the article was the fact that Cinemark earned a measly $256 million last year. The theater industry is even worse off than I thought.

A little off topic, but the doctor I work for mentioned a new subscription service called Moviepass in which you can see one 2D movie per day at most major theaters for $10/month. It is a very popular service and may revive the failing industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 10:43 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,551,388 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyNameIsBellaMia View Post
Quoted for truth.


One of my favorite grocery stores has lost my business because they have a zillion handicapped parking places and if you don't have the permit, you have to park a very long way from the building. Normally, a walk like that wouldn't bother me, but the last 2 times I went there, I just had a couple of things to buy, pretty much all the handicapped parking was empty, and it just pizzed me off. A few reserved parking places is fine, but literally the first quarter of the entire parking lot was reserved (and empty).
It pizzed you off because you as a healthy person had to, gasp, walk a little longer to the store? OH NO! You know what pizzes me off? When I see healthy people with no handicapped placard on their license plate or hanging from their rearview mirror parked in handicapped spots. And people wonder why we have overweight people in this country.....because they're too lazy to walk through a parking lot to a store.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top