Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2017, 05:34 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
Indeed. 1 & 3 Conservatives are constructionists and visa versa.
LOL. Oh you are funny. No. No they are not.

Liberals are constructionists and visa versa.

Just as much nonsense.

Don't confuse the two political views as being somehow constructionists. Neither is. Conservatives, especially as of late, have been far from it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2017, 05:37 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,739 posts, read 7,613,748 times
Reputation: 15007
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Conservatives, especially as of late, have been far from it.
Yet another confused person who mistakes Republicans for conservatives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 05:53 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,776,567 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Go, Grassley and McConnell. Do it!

Putting a large number of conservatives and other strict-constructionists on the Federal bench (including the Supreme Court) is on of the greatest contributions to American safety and prosperity Trump could make.
So we can have more Citizens United where billionaires rule our political parties? Constitutionalists are a mis-nomer, they're nothing but corrupt right wing activists.

Conservatives Judges will truly put the final nail in this country's coffin. CU has already done massive damage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 05:54 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,776,567 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Yet another confused person who mistakes Republicans for conservatives.
Both are horrible, so it's irrelevant. All they care about is destroying people's lives. It's what they do best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 05:55 PM
 
34,058 posts, read 17,081,326 times
Reputation: 17213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Go, Grassley and McConnell. Do it!

Putting a large number of conservatives and other strict-constructionists on the Federal bench (including the Supreme Court) is on of the greatest contributions to American safety and prosperity Trump could make.
MAGA for decades to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Planet Telex
5,900 posts, read 3,901,723 times
Reputation: 5857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Go, Grassley and McConnell. Do it!

Putting a large number of conservatives and other strict-constructionists on the Federal bench (including the Supreme Court) is on of the greatest contributions to American safety and prosperity Trump could make.
Since Nixon appointed Burger and Rhenquist, appointments to the Supreme Court have involved one useless mediocre hack after another. I cannot even remember most of their names, and I challenge anyone to point to a single decision of the last forty years where any one of these conservative judges have undercut the power of our mendacious corporate plutocracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,297 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
Doh! From my op. So anxious to knee jerk respond, you do not read?

For those unfamiliar, judiciary nominations are presented on blue stationary - have been since the very early 1900s. The custom was for a nominee's home state senator to be given an opportunity to note how they would vote. The home state senator made their note on the same blue nomination stationary the nomination came on and returned it tot he Judiciary Committee. In other words, it was a courtesy...

Once the blue slip is gone, there will nothing, nothing stopping all of his current and future nominees being approved.

Of course, I know why Senator Reid did it. Politics. it always boils down to that. Politics is power, is war, is for the marbles.

You want to tell me rare parliamentary moves used not once (Ocare passage via budget reconciliation), but twice (the nuclear option) and this are not about politics???

Senate Democrats took the dramatic step Thursday of eliminating filibusters for most nominations by presidents, a power play they said was necessary to fix a broken system but one that Republicans said will only rupture it further.[/color]

Democrats used a rare parliamentary move to change the rules so that federal judicial nominees and executive-office appointments can advance to confirmation votes by a simple majority of senators, rather than the 60-vote supermajority that has been the standard for nearly four decades.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.a7751f937372
The article is lacking on the details as to why Reed used the nuclear option, do you know the specifics?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 07:41 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,639 posts, read 18,235,725 times
Reputation: 34509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
So we can have more Citizens United where billionaires rule our political parties? Constitutionalists are a mis-nomer, they're nothing but corrupt right wing activists.

Conservatives Judges will truly put the final nail in this country's coffin. CU has already done massive damage.
What "damage" has Citizens United (which was a correct interpretation of the Constitution, regardless of whether its unpopular in some circles) done? It certainly didn't help billionaires buy the election for Hillary Clinton this last go around, even though she and her cronies raised well over a billion dollars for her campaign, which was nearly twice the amount that the Trump Campaign and affiliated groups raised: https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/g...n-fundraising/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 07:45 PM
 
3,674 posts, read 8,663,931 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Go, Grassley and McConnell. Do it!

Putting a large number of conservatives and other strict-constructionists on the Federal bench (including the Supreme Court) is on of the greatest contributions to American safety and prosperity Trump could make.
Given our rousing success with the War on Drugs, the War on Terror, the War on Alcohol, the War on Communists in Hollywood, and other such conservative endeavors, I have no doubt we'll see a resurgence of failed policy. It's the only thing conservatives know how to do: try the same thing again and again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 08:45 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,297 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
What "damage" has Citizens United (which was a correct interpretation of the Constitution, regardless of whether its unpopular in some circles) done? It certainly didn't help billionaires buy the election for Hillary Clinton this last go around, even though she and her cronies raised well over a billion dollars for her campaign, which was nearly twice the amount that the Trump Campaign and affiliated groups raised: https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/g...n-fundraising/
Money doesn't always win but it certainly corrupts in many ways, nameless donors, Super Pac's and their lobbyist take away to voice of voters. Do you think that congressmen are going to fund their campaigns or listen to their constituents. You shouldn't be dismissing the impact of Citizens United based on one presidential election and ignoring congress.


The more important point you missed is that these Pac's don't directly coordinate with candidates, they are independent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top