Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We can allow anyone reading to decide. You need to provide it before you can disagree with me. You've provided nothing for anyone to decide.
Here's what I'm getting at...It places all the burden of proof on the peaceful people, when the burden of proof should be on the people who want to violate people's rights. We should be the ones saying "prove that statism is necessary, and if we're not convinced then you don't get a state". Unfortunately we're the minority and can't enforce that yet.
It's the same as arguing with someone who says "well you can't prove that God doesn't exist, so you need to follow his commands". The burden is on that person to prove it, not for us to prove that he doesn't exist.
Here's what I'm getting at...It places all the burden of proof on the peaceful people, when the burden of proof should be on the people who want to violate people's rights. We should be the ones saying "prove that statism is necessary, and if we're not convinced then you don't get a state". Unfortunately we're the minority and can't enforce that yet.
Plus we can't "ask" for compliance at gunpoint.
Get a lot of "correct answers" when a gun is pointed at your head.
Here's what I'm getting at...It places all the burden of proof on the peaceful people, when the burden of proof should be on the people who want to violate people's rights. We should be the ones saying "prove that statism is necessary, and if we're not convinced then you don't get a state". Unfortunately we're the minority and can't enforce that yet.
It's the same as arguing with someone who says "well you can't prove that God doesn't exist, so you need to follow his commands". The burden is on that person to prove it, not for us to prove that he doesn't exist.
Because there are very, very, very, few interested in no state, not even you........the idea that there should be is what created the country to start with.
I can argue that we should spend trillions in trying to colonize Pluto but I'm not going to get anywhere because I have no workable plan to do it or enough people even interested.
Are you telling me the ends don't justify the means?
That's not what you were promoting earlier.
The only real thing I've promoted is the proven idea that you are unable to provide a better alternative. It goes this way every time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
