Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should the Republican Party split?
Yes 34 44.16%
No 27 35.06%
Don't care 16 20.78%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2017, 09:51 AM
 
16,575 posts, read 8,600,121 times
Reputation: 19400

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
If the GOP was wise, and I'm not saying they are, they'd divorce themselves from the brain-dead "religious right."

Any bets?

It depends on how you define the religious right.
If you mean to lose many of those who are against the anything goes mentality of drugs, perverted sexual practices, abortion on demand at any stage, etc. then no that would not be in the (R's) best interest. Far too many social conservatives who believe in traditional values/morals make up the (R's), whether they are particularly religious or not.
To lose them would be a liberals dream of splitting the party so the Democrats (who have been hijacked by the far left) could win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2017, 10:00 AM
 
23,971 posts, read 15,075,178 times
Reputation: 12949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells5 View Post
Both of the established parties are losing support. Since the beginning of 2017, voters who classify themselves as independents are increasingly in the majority with 40+%.


Party Affiliation | Gallup Historical Trends


Truth is people are fed up with what some term the "duopoly," the career politicians of both parties whose main goal is to be reelected and to do the bidding of special interests.


Also democrats are advised not to delude themselves with respect to the "new demographic." All the republican establishment has to do to bring out masses of voters (including independents) is to run ads featuring the faces of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Who will the independents vote for in a primary?

Still leaves our choice for POTUS determined by the 2 major parties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,934,056 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
Who will the independents vote for in a primary?

Still leaves our choice for POTUS determined by the 2 major parties.
The Right will say that the Indes will support them and the Left will make the same claim, both are delusional and proof that they do not actually understand Independents, the concept is foreign to Party Faithful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 10:10 AM
 
20,757 posts, read 8,573,399 times
Reputation: 14393
No need to split. Just replace the lazy arses, which is what Bannon is working towards.
Daily Beast article gives him the credit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,934,056 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
No need to split. Just replace the lazy arses, which is what Bannon is working towards.
Daily Beast article gives him the credit.

That is not Bannon's agenda, anyone that knows the Sleaze Ball knows what he is about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,215 posts, read 11,331,262 times
Reputation: 20828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
If the GOP was wise, and I'm not saying they are, they'd divorce themselves from the brain-dead "religious right."

Any bets?

Just as soon as the Cult of the Braying Jackass divorces itself from the Snowflake Left and the drug/gang/welfare underclass -- which ain't gonna happen anytime soon because they are "wise" enough to know that they can't win without their loyalty, (bought mostly at the expense of the responsible minority).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post
It depends on how you define the religious right.
I don't define them and neither do you. They are who they are.
Quote:
If you mean to lose many of those who are against the anything goes mentality of drugs, perverted sexual practices, abortion on demand at any stage, etc. then no that would not be in the (R's) best interest. Far too many social conservatives who believe in traditional values/morals make up the (R's), whether they are particularly religious or not.
To lose them would be a liberals dream of splitting the party so the Democrats (who have been hijacked by the far left) could win.
One prominent Republican's view on the subject.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 09:13 AM
 
5,299 posts, read 6,177,484 times
Reputation: 5480
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
Who will the independents vote for in a primary?

Still leaves our choice for POTUS determined by the 2 major parties.

23 states allow independents to vote in partisan primaries. More should do so but the party elites and special interests want to control the nomination process,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Talking You're angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
Just as soon as the Cult of the Braying Jackass divorces itself from the Snowflake Left and the drug/gang/welfare underclass -- which ain't gonna happen anytime soon because they are "wise" enough to know that they can't win without their loyalty, (bought mostly at the expense of the responsible minority).
Victory fatigue?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 10:02 AM
 
23,971 posts, read 15,075,178 times
Reputation: 12949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells5 View Post
23 states allow independents to vote in partisan primaries. More should do so but the party elites and special interests want to control the nomination process,
New York made the change your party affiliation so far ahead of the primary season, lots of people could not vote. IIRC, 6 months. DD and grandson could not vote because they were registered independent.

Texas has open primaries. One declares their affiliation when they show up at a polling place. If I vote R, I cannot vote in the D run off.

I kinda like the system used by some states that put all candidates for a position on the ballot. The top 2 or 3 vote getters are on the ballot in the general.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top