Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
995 posts, read 510,065 times
Reputation: 2175

Advertisements

I'm sure many of you are aware of the National Park Service's proposal to dramatically increase admission fees at the largest and most popular National Parks. A typical auto pass costing $30 now will rise to $70, putting it in line with theme park admission fees.

Is this a good thing, or should it be shot down on sight? I will admit that I have an Access Pass to the parks, meaning this will not affect me a bit, although I do see a big plus in reduced crowds. Nothing worse than being stuck in gridlock when trying to enjoy nature. However, this has the potential of discouraging families on a budget from being able to experience the wonders of our esteemed national park system.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:31 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,716,760 times
Reputation: 12943
If the fees collected go directly to my two blue state parks, I'm fine with it. If they are collected from my state to benefit some other state, I'm not good with it. I am very tired of seeing blue state money going to red states. There should be complete visibility on the amount collected from each park and exactly what infrastructure the money is benefitting. I have no issue to contributing to my own state parks though - they are stunning and we are proud of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:31 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,912,422 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radical_Thinker View Post
I'm sure many of you are aware of the National Park Service's proposal to dramatically increase admission fees at the largest and most popular National Parks. A typical auto pass costing $30 now will rise to $70, putting it in line with theme park admission fees.

Is this a good thing, or should it be shot down on sight? I will admit that I have an Access Pass to the parks, meaning this will not affect me a bit, although I do see a big plus in reduced crowds. Nothing worse than being stuck in gridlock when trying to enjoy nature. However, this has the potential of discouraging families on a budget from being able to experience the wonders of our esteemed national park system.

Thoughts?
As someone that uses the parks very regularly (my yearly pass always pays for itself in just a few months), I'm fine to pay more. I'll keep going because I love the parks, and I support their purpose for existing.

I worry that more expensive parks will mean less people will feel open to going to them, and that would be a bad thing long-term. A population that is disconnected from the natural world won't feel the need or desire to protect it. And it will continue to need protection.

In an ideal world, National Parks would either be free or be as cheap as possible to enter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:32 PM
 
184 posts, read 144,048 times
Reputation: 429
I suspect attendance numbers will go down, which will justify even more massive cuts and/or closures. I wonder if it will push more people to buy passes, or whether the pass price will increase as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
Tribute to walk over non-privatized land.

They saw us coming when they charged the first penny and people paid it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:34 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,912,422 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcwick View Post
I suspect attendance numbers will go down, which will justify even more massive cuts and/or closures. I wonder if it will push more people to buy passes, or whether the pass price will increase as well.
I worry about this, too - but I don't think we (the American people) would allow it to happen. That is, a current National Park to either close or sell off parts of its land to private interests...

But, then again, the risk is there. Especially if the general population shows less and less of an interest in the parks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:34 PM
 
3,564 posts, read 1,922,565 times
Reputation: 3732
You, a radical thinker: this must be good or bad

Me, much dumber: maybe there are good and bad aspects to both
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:35 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,912,422 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Tribute to walk over non-privatized land.

They saw us coming when they charged the first penny and people paid it.
It would be nice if they were free for all to use. But it does cost money to keep them up and to maintain their facilities. What other payment system would you propose?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:37 PM
 
12,905 posts, read 15,662,473 times
Reputation: 9394
The National Parks are there for all people to enjoy. Obviously, it will become a place that only those with discretionary income can afford to visit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 02:37 PM
 
7,269 posts, read 4,214,344 times
Reputation: 5466
totally against it. fees are high enough already. more push-through inflation transferred to taxpayers because govt. wastes money hand over fist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top