Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seriously doubt that. He was probably hateful of this country to begin with. Practicing Muslims do not assimilate into this country and something about our culture probably pushed him over the edge which made him easy to radicalize.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge;49994742[B
]Do you understand that this guy likely came to this country with the best of intentions? [/b]It's unlikely that he came here with the intention of doing what he did yesterday. If that was his intention, why would he have waited SEVEN years to act out? He was radicalized HERE. What sort of vetting predicts that a person without any terrorist connections would be radicalized AFTER moving to the United States? Do you think President Trump has some sort of scientific formula that tells us who will become a radical later in life?
I think properly vetting people is common sense. I don't think that any vetting, extreme or otherwise, is able to see years into the future. And so those who are whining about vetting in this case aren't really talking about vetting at all. It's just more of the we are afraid of Muslims so we shouldn't let them into this country tripe.
Schumer and those liberal Judges Watson and Chuang and both parties all have blood on their hands for blocking President Trump's immigration and deportation policies.
President Trump, cut-off any federal monies to any sanctuary cities. You can do this .
yeah ummm....what have the democrats done for 8 years to prevent this from happening besides letting more of these people in and giving them free money and healthcare???
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile
Mmm, yes. Except he's been here since 2010 & Uzbekistan isn't on the travel ban. So you, trump & all the other cons are one giant fail. Per usual.
Schumer and those liberal Judges Watson and Chuang and both parties all have blood on their hands for blocking President Trump's immigration and deportation policies.
President Trump, cut-off any federal monies to any sanctuary cities. You can do this .
Diversity Visas were a part of the 1990 Immigration Act with bipartisan support and signed into law by Bush 1.
Schumer was a member of the bipartisan " Gang of Eight" who created the proposed Immigration Act of 2013 that was never voted on by the House. This proposed legislation Included ending Diversity Visas.
As is usual, some are compelled to politicize every tragedy.
There's one person responsible for this horrorific act of terrorism and it's the driver of the rental truck.
long before ISIS. and yeah he voted to end the diversity visa program and replace it with what???
and yes the terrorist is responsible but what have the democrats done for 8 years when Obama was president to prevent this from happening besides letting more of these people in and giving them free money and health care/
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom
Diversity Visas were a part of the 1990 Immigration Act with bipartisan support and signed into law by Bush 1.
Schumer was a member of the bipartisan " Gang of Eight" who created the proposed Immigration Act of 2013 that was never voted on by the House. This proposed legislation Included ending Diversity Visas.
As is usual, some are compelled to politicize every tragedy.
There's one person responsible for this horrorific act of terrorism and it's the driver of the rental truck.
Terrorist is originally from Uzbekistan, a former Soviet nation which maintains close ties to the Kremlin.
Terrorist is armed with a paint ball gun, a pellet gun, and a pickup he rented at the Home Depot. Conveniently, he leaves a note in the pickup about ISIS.
What a stroke of good fortune for Trump, who has rants against "radical Islamic terrorists" and was in desperate need of a distraction
Does anyone else think this sounds mighty suspicious?
I was thinking exactly this last night.
Interesting, isn't it, how so many are willing to believe that Sandy Hook and Las Vegas were "false flags" but no cries from those same quarters about this.
Remember too, that the FB, twitter and google execs testified yesterday about the Russian propaganda efforts leading up to the election.
Pushed that right off the "front pages," didn't it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
