Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 21 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,549 posts, read 16,536,658 times
Reputation: 6032
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisanicole1
I still believe that HRC lost because well she was HRC and if anyone else ran against her DJT would not have won. There were MANY people who voted for DJT because he was not HRC and because they were sick and tired of certain families running our government and being entitled to do so.
That's what I believe, does not make that fact.
Thats fine, but that has nothing to do with the article.
Hence, why post it in this thread which is about the article.
Its a weird argument that doesnt make sense unless the argument is that Clinton should have taken all the money her campaign was making for the DNC instead of some.
Yes, from this article, I gather that Clinton was already running the DNC and its funds a year before she was even nominated. If you find nothing wrong with that than fine. I do.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 21 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,549 posts, read 16,536,658 times
Reputation: 6032
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisanicole1
Yes, from this article, I gather that Clinton was already running the DNC and its funds a year before she was even nominated. If you find nothing wrong with that than fine. I do.
The article says the DNC and the Clinton campaign signed a joint fundraising agreement (the Sanders campaign has one to). There is indeed nothing wrong with that since it is common practice from both parties.
The only part I could see you having a problem with is the part about the communications director .
The article says the DNC and the Clinton campaign signed a joint fundraising agreement (the Sanders campaign has one to). There is indeed nothing wrong with that since it is common practice from both parties.
The only part I could see you having a problem with is the part about the communications director .
No, it says that usually those Agreements are signed AFTER the nomination not a year before. Which would make sense.
I'm old enough to remember when Trump's cult hated Donna Brazille. Now she's their friend. How nice.
lmao...Doesn't James Comey ring a bell for you Leftists? How many names was he called by Leftists? How many times was he blamed for HRC's loss? Then he went after Trump and you ALL loved him again. I have no love for DB.
I'm old enough to remember when Trump's cult hated Donna Brazille. Now she's their friend. How nice.
No she is not. Just wondering why she decided to come out with this and not keep it "secret" (not that it ever was). Still think she is a liar, cheater and all around bad person.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
