Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2017, 08:08 PM
 
524 posts, read 574,592 times
Reputation: 1093

Advertisements

I am not too upset about this part. I am not sure I understand the thinking of allowing a max 500K of gains to go untaxed, especially for those who are doing it every 2 years. If you are fixing it up, keep your receipts for improvements to add to the home's basis. Taxing the actual gain seems fair. It's not like people can't still move, they will just have to pay taxes on the gain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2017, 08:12 PM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,799,509 times
Reputation: 4381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
They may renovate these homes in certain communities but it also drives up the cost of real estate and removes a viable property from prospective buyers.
Right, the flippers aren't helping anyone except themselves. Leave the house on the market for someone that will buy it, and keep it. I don't need a house with a golden toilet installed by a flipper just to try and raise the price of the house by 5k. They can kiss my rear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2017, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,269 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15639
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Every 2 years like clockwork is not the norm for most people I would assume. But some people sell a home after owning if less than 5 years. Especially younger people because they are upsizing homes and they are also moving up in their careers and might relocate for a job to get a promotion. Young people get married and have kids at a quick pace and both are big reasons to sell a home (to buy a different home).

Keep in mind that half of marriages end in divorce. Home sales often occur due to divorces. This could occur suddenly and the couple might have own the home for 3.5 years and need to sell.

People also sell their house when they lose their job. Could be 4 years into owning your home and you lose your job. So you might sell because you want to move to a different city that has better job opportunities, or sell the house because the only reason you owned it was to be near the job (that you no longer have).

I bet most people reading this have either sold a home or condo after owning it less than 5 years, or knows someone that has done so.
I don't know it there are statistics but selling a home in 2 years is a losing proposition for the most part, almost no one does that unless there is a rare situation.. Moving from a high cost area to a new location maybe but that is a big hit. Moving to a new home in 2 years has to be a very low percentage unless you are an investor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2017, 11:03 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,417,223 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
This is HUGE and will have a negative impact on the Real Estate market.

People will be forced to stay in their homes longer to avoid paying cap gains taxes. This will result in fewer homes sales and can impact home sales volumes, which impacts the home building industry and the real estate industry.

People that move sooner than 5 of past 8 years will have to pay taxes on the capital gain. The end result of this is a TAX INCREASE.

Unless they buy a new house of equal value. The old rollover law isn’t dead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 02:44 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,084,949 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Prices should go higher since less people will be selling. When the supply goes down, prices go up.
But, if the people waiting for the five years all start selling their homes at the same time, there could be a glut of homes on the market three to five years after the plan is adopted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 06:13 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,589,940 times
Reputation: 8923
Another soaking for the doing well but not rich enough to matter club.

Billionaires get tax cuts whether they are doing good or bad for the economy. The 250K guy who owns a successful business gets one up the backside.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 06:17 AM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,483,864 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Unless they buy a new house of equal value. The old rollover law isn’t dead.
The old rollover law IS dead for primary residences and has been gone for at least 15 years. There is something called a 1031 exchange (for investment property) but primary residences are excluded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 06:20 AM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,483,864 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I don't know it there are statistics but selling a home in 2 years is a losing proposition for the most part, almost no one does that unless there is a rare situation.. Moving from a high cost area to a new location maybe but that is a big hit. Moving to a new home in 2 years has to be a very low percentage unless you are an investor.
How about selling a home in 3, 4, or 4.5 years? These moves are very common for regular non-investors. People decide to move for various reasons. The new law impacts anyone that lived in/owed their home for less than 5 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 06:26 AM
 
2,212 posts, read 1,073,926 times
Reputation: 1381
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
How about selling a home in 3, 4, or 4.5 years? These moves are very common for regular non-investors. People decide to move for various reasons. The new law impacts anyone that lived in/owed their home for less than 5 years.
Average time in a home is 13 years for move up buyers and 11 years for first time buyers.
source: NAHB
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 06:41 AM
 
7,269 posts, read 4,212,399 times
Reputation: 5466
Quote:
Another rip off tax and part of the GOP shell game. Get rid of the capital gains tax, its the peoples money, the state did nothing to earn it.
reduce the size of govt. and govt. spending. move ALL govt. employees off federal pensions and onto 401k's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top