Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
His pattern is to NAIL as much as possible, and then plea it down to get information on others..
Beg pardon, but is incorrect. His pattern is to build a strong case in a field like economic crime where amassing evidence in the form of paperwork makes a conviction alomst certain. That's the leverage he uses to get information. He does not lead with his most serious charge, because that would be stupid. And he's not. He leads with the most certain one.
I still have no idea how "fake charges" fit in, but you do you.
no he was appointed by the acting attorney general who was put in place by an OBAMA appointee.
President Donald Trump announced his intention to nominate Rosenstein to serve as Deputy Attorney General for the United States Department of Justice on January 31, 2017. Rosenstein was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on April 25, 2017
Beg pardon, but is incorrect. His pattern is to build a strong case in a field like economic crime where amassing evidence in the form of paperwork makes a conviction alomst certain. That's the leverage he uses to get information. He does not lead with his most serious charge, because that would be stupid. And he's not. He leads with the most certain one.
I still have no idea how "fake charges" fit in, but you do you.
nail as much as possible and build a strong case is exactly the same..
If Manafort is guilty of the crimes he's accused of committing, lock him the hell up. I do find it funny, however, that of the indictments handed down, none of them have anything to do with "collision"
We've been saying all along that this is nothing more than a fishing expedition. Had their been any evidence of collision/law-breaking in that regard, trust that those indictments would've been the first handed down. Note, it is particularly disturbing that the entire basis of this phony investigation came from a trumped up investigation funded by the Dims/Crooked Hillary (which they broke the law to conceal by not listing the multi-million dollar expenditure on campaign finance filings) that included actual collision with foreign agents to (guess what?) influence the election in Crooked Hillary's favor. The irony is too much for many leftists to handle, so they conveniently ignore this bombshell.
Was there a motor vehicle accident of some kind? That's often when a collision occurs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
The charges are for activities NOT RELATED to the campaign. What part of this is beyond your ability to comprehend?
nail as much as possible and build a strong case is exactly the same..
Not at all. Try this:
Mopery is a crime that carries a punishment of 50 years in prison, and you suspect that the mayor and a number of his aides are all guilty of mopery. Sadly, mopery is very hard to prove, relying extensively on witness testimony - and nobody wants to talk.
Dopery is a crime that carries a punishment of 5 years in jail and being scolded as a naughty boy in front of the courthouse. Turns out, you can build a very strong case, purely on technical evidence, that one of the the mayor's aides is guilty of dopery. So you arrest him on the dopery charge, shows him and his lawyer the evidence that makes it clear that in court, he'll be found guilty of dopery. (This is the strong case.)
And as they digest that, you bring up the mopery investigation that also involves the aide. No, he's not arrested for that, certainly. Not yet. But perhaps a bit of cooperation on the mopery investigation could lead to leniency on the dopery one.
The mayor's aide has two options:
He can refuse all cooperation, go for broke, and be almost certain of 5 years in the slammer, a scolding, and uncertainty about the much more serious mopery investigation.
Or he can cooperate, get a very light sentence on the dopery charge and possibly avoid mopery charges at all.
Mopery is a crime that carries a punishment of 50 years in prison, and you suspect that the mayor and a number of his aides are all guilty of mopery. Sadly, mopery is very hard to prove, relying extensively on witness testimony - and nobody wants to talk.
Dopery is a crime that carries a punishment of 5 years in jail and being scolded as a naughty boy in front of the courthouse. Turns out, you can build a very strong case, purely on technical evidence, that one of the the mayor's aides is guilty of dopery. So you arrest him on the dopery charge, shows him and his lawyer the evidence that makes it clear that in court, he'll be found guilty of dopery. (This is the strong case.)
And as they digest that, you bring up the mopery investigation that also involves the aide. No, he's not arrested for that, certainly. Not yet. But perhaps a bit of cooperation on the mopery investigation could lead to leniency on the dopery one.
The mayor's aide has two options:
He can refuse all cooperation, go for broke, and be almost certain of 5 years in the slammer, a scolding, and uncertainty about the much more serious mopery investigation.
Or he can cooperate, get a very light sentence on the dopery charge and possibly avoid mopery charges at all.
Manafort is going in for dopery.
An apt analogy. The crime of dopery definitely goes to the top.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.