Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:04 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
3,868 posts, read 4,079,169 times
Reputation: 2378

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
You including the military and police in that statement?
You don't even know what one is, but yeah lets ban em
Libs don't have a clue, not only about weapons.........I'm talking life in general.

 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:11 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,837,332 times
Reputation: 20030
everyone for gun control laws must remember that the difference between a citizen and a subject is the firearms. citizens have them, subjects dont.
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:12 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
The gun control creeps and fanatics are as uneducated and misguided about firearms as they are when they babble about climate change.
They truly are loose cannons.
Precisely! They are clueless about what it is they are arguing against.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azPLqyNQKSs
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:27 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,487,222 times
Reputation: 16962
Firearms owners are imbued with no greater an intelligence quotient about their firearms, as it pertains to common sense discsussions about their danger, than those who ultimately decided Dynamite needed restrictions. Give that nonsense a rest.

There are just as many ex servicemen who spent years listening to them make a lot of noise who would advise strict restrictions be placed upon certain firearms types/acquisition provisions as there are those suggesting your rights and freedoms are directly impinged without reason by contolling them.

They were smarter back then I guess, when both the safety and freedom memes pitched today probably having even more relevance:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...-then-than-now

https://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~rcollin...ship/guns.html
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,601,062 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Workin_Hard View Post
Do you have a car which is capable of exceeding the speed limit? If so, why do you need such a thing? It's obviously designed for only one thing - to break the law and put others at unnecessary risk. My right to be safe on the road exceeds your right to drive fast.
False equivalency
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,601,062 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
It might be handy against a home invasion situation.
That's what pistols are for
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:30 AM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,370,877 times
Reputation: 11375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambler123 View Post
And yet the worst of the gun-nuts feel that no tests or restrictions should be placed on guns... even though their purpose is "death" and just as capable of killing as a car. They also feel that there should be no additional tests for owning the firearms equivalent of a: big-rig, an oil tanker, a tank, etc. It's pure insanity on their part.
You let me know when you've finished disarming the governments of his world, and then we can talk about disarming the people.

Somehow, though, we always find out that you gun-grabbers don't actually have a problem with guns; you have a problem with powerless people having guns.
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:32 AM
 
45,223 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24979
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Firearms owners are imbued with no greater an intelligence quotient about their firearms, as it pertains to common sense discsussions about their danger, than those who ultimately decided Dynamite needed restrictions. Give that nonsense a rest.

There are just as many ex servicemen who spent years listening to them make a lot of noise who would advise strict restrictions be placed upon certain firearms types/acquisition provisions as there are those suggesting your rights and freedoms are directly impinged without reason by contolling them.

They were smarter back then I guess, when both the safety and freedom memes pitched today probably having even more relevance:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...-then-than-now

https://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~rcollin...ship/guns.html
I stopped reading when I saw the term "common sense" lol
A control freaks favorite term (lie) before they steal something else from you
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:33 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,837,332 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Firearms owners are imbued with no more a greater intelligence quotient about their firearms as it pertains to common sense discsussions about their danger than those who ultimately decided Dynamite needed restrictions give that nonsense a rest.

There are just as many ex servicemen who spent years listening to them make a lot of noise who would advise strict restrictions be placed upon certain firearms types/acquisition provisions as there are those suggesting your rights and freedoms are directly impinged without reason by contolling them.

They were smarter back then I guess, when both the safety and freedom memes pitched today probably had even more relevance:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...-then-than-now

https://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~rcollin...ship/guns.html
yes there was a restriction on carrying a firearm in some cities and towns back then, long before the scotus ruled that the second amendment allowed citizens to carry firearms, and before state laws allowed open carry. but the big thing there was that like a business, you had to check your firearms at the door so to speak. you would get them back once you were leaving. there was no restriction on owning a firearm.
 
Old 11-08-2017, 07:34 AM
 
5,913 posts, read 3,185,345 times
Reputation: 4397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patsfan20 View Post
Picking up my AR next month......great to be an American!
What do you want to kill with that kind of gun? Why do you need it unless you are planning on killing lots of fellow Americans??? That is the gun of choice for mass murderers. You want to be associated.

Gun Violence Archive
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top