Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This such a bizarre position to take. It was common knowledge LOCALLY in Arizona. Why on Earth would a guy in South Carolina know about a local politician's behavior 2,000 miles away when the victims have not come out publicly? We know about it now because, like the woman exposing liberals in Hollywood, the woman are stepping forward and speaking out.
If you think it is easy for a woman to come out and accuse a very powerful man, putting them through all of this scrutiny as they are called liars, you would be wrong. That is especially true when the victim is a teenager. It's a very brave thing to do and there's a reason woman have been reluctant in the past, just as the victims of child abuse are reluctant to tell their story.
This is not that hard to understand.
They aren't coming out and speaking out under oath and allowing themselves to be cross examined. Why couldn't they come out during the Republican primary so that Republican voters could choose another candidate?
You have no idea if these claims are true or not so to say it is 'brave' is to make the assertion they are true without any evidence.
As I pointedd out, the mall manager in the early 80s said Moore was not on a ban list at the mall and there were never any accusations against him. Yet it asserted it was common knowledge he was a predator but somehow the mall manager didn't have this common knowledge.
I believe Alfred agreed to a neutral analysis but only if Roy agrees to testify under oath. Way too much time spent on this, plenty of other accusers and witnesses. This just seems desperate.
If you want Roy to testify under oath, it makes sense you pursue this in court, rather than trial in the media.
Most likely, these women disappear once the election is over. That is how it is usually works with Glorida Allred's accusers against Republican candidates.
I believe Alfred agreed to a neutral analysis but only if Roy agrees to testify under oath. Way too much time spent on this, plenty of other accusers and witnesses. This just seems desperate.
She wants to run out the clock. She should turn over the yearbook immediately if she thinks it's a valid signature. Otherwise, she's purposely dragging her feet, because she knows it's inauthentic. No one has yet answered the question, "How did Roy Moore's assistant happen to place her initials after his yearbook "signature"?" Please explain.
Gloria reputation would destroyed were it a forgery. She doesn't act political. As for these women not coming out earlier is easy to see why. The Weinstein case has opened the flood gates.
you're making the assumption that the "DA" is the assistant's initials and not simply moore overstating his credentials as a deputy DA.
Seems much more probable the yearbook accuser saw DA on her divorce paperwork and assumed Moore signed off with a DA. Note that the accuser didn't mention Moore presided over her divorce.
It doesn't seem likely a man in his 30s is going to include his occupation if he signed a yearbook, and date it twice, and include location of the restaurant. Doesn't seem likely that he writes part of the note in cursive, then ends with print.
Seems much more probable the yearbook accuser saw DA on her divorce paperwork and assumed Moore signed off with a DA.
Predator often cover their tracks. He had a plan when he signed it and that was to have sex with her. Let's see some other things he signed such as other year books etc.
One of their dishonest things is to make it seem like there are multiple women accusing him of preying on them when they were underage when there are only two such accusations.
Predator often cover their tracks. He had a plan when he signed it and that was to have sex with her. Let's see some other things he signed such as other year books etc.
His signature is all over the internet. He finishes the y in Roy way up high and that doesn't match the y in Roy in the yearbook, which finishes down low.
If Moore was covering his tracks, why would he sign a yearbook and include the location of restaurant if he was going to attempt rape at that restaurant parking lot.
Assuming liberals are right and Roy is a predator......the election is between a predator and a man who supports abortion up to 1 second prior to childbirth and who campaigns with Joe Biden who appears to be a pervert, caught on video touching women and girls.
What a choice. lol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
