Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:38 AM
 
26,577 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7435

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
That's an assumption that you are making. Again, it isn't probable that a man who wasn't DA signed off with DA in a yearbook, ....
you criticize for an assumption..... then go directly into an assumption.

 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,404,153 times
Reputation: 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
you criticize for an assumption..... then go directly into an assumption.
My assumption is a much more probable scenario. Your assumption is a man who is not a DA goes around signing everything including a yearbook with DA.

I don't think you can find any Roy Moore signature from that era with a DA that wsa not his assistant's initials.

The yearbook accuser had a lot of bad luck , b/c what are the odds the DA on the divorce paperwork are actually a person's initials and not an abbreviation for district attorney. lol
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:43 AM
 
26,577 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
My assumption is a much more probable scenario. Your assumption is a man who is not a DA goes around signing everything including a yearbook with DA.
my assumption was that a forged signature should look like the reference source it was forged from.

not a big leap.
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,404,153 times
Reputation: 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
my assumption was that a forged signature should look like the reference source it was forged from.

not a big leap.
you are assuming a pro did the forgery.

The R and y in Roy do not look like Roy's signature in the divorce paperwork yet you still assert it his signature. The 7's don't look similar to his 7's.
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:46 AM
 
26,577 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
I don't think you can find any Roy Moore signature from that era ....
at this point i'd be happy to see a few from that era, DA or not, to compare for consistency.
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,404,153 times
Reputation: 4077
Ok, well I think you've already made your mind up about this, given you appear opposed to the yearbook being handed over to a neutral custodian so that experts can look at the ink.
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:47 AM
 
26,577 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
you are assuming a pro did the forgery.
anyone copying a signature is going to copy from there reference source.

not a hard concept.
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,404,153 times
Reputation: 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
anyone copying a signature is going to copy from there reference source.

not a hard concept.
Ok so you think it is a legit Roy signature even though the R and y do not look similar to the R and y on the divorce paperwork.

it is funny that you have had multiple posts on this topic but you claim not to have seen Roy's signature anywhere. The divorce paperwork signature is all over the internet.
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:49 AM
 
26,577 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
Ok, well I think you've already made your mind up about this, given you appear opposed to the yearbook being handed over to a neutral custodian ....
wrong.

i just don't trust moore's lawyers to select a neutral custodian ( nor allred ). i'm actually hoping it ends up in a house/senate investigation.
 
Old 11-20-2017, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,404,153 times
Reputation: 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
wrong.

i just don't trust moore's lawyers to select a neutral custodian ( nor allred ). i'm actually hoping it ends up in a house/senate investigation.
Ok, you know that isn't going to happen prior to an election. They have no claim to investigate a non-senator. Keep in mind this same senate has not kicked out Al Franken or Bob Menendez and probably won't even investigate the two.

I think most fair and reasonable people are going to dismiss this accusation b/c the accuser won't release the yearbook. Given it is the worst allegation by far, that should mean Moore is out of the woods as far as the election goes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top