Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Never heard of a billionaire that didnt have tens of thousands of employees which improved their lives as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
You know billionaires who have never created a job? Really? Examples please....
well, you went and moved the goal posts again, so good for you for being consistent. Your point was you never heard of any billionaire that didn't have 10's of thousands of employees, which I countered, I know of many billionaires who don't have "10's of thousands of employees".
As for your new point- pick a random Walton, would be no different then if their shares were held by Share Holder X.
Last edited by Metsfan53; 11-13-2017 at 03:32 PM..
You said name a billionaire who hasn't created jobs, if you were looking for more specifics, you should have stated so
Do you wanna try to list an AMERICAN one affected by OUR TAX CODE.. I have yet to hear of one individual concerned about the wealth of monarchs around the world..
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,601,062 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96
You do know that unions are allowed in right to work states .....right?
They just can't make participation or paying dues mandatory as a condition of employment.
Not sure why anyone would have a problem with that?
Because, in a shop with a union, non union employees also generally get the benefits of the union. But if they don't pay dues (which if they don't have to, they won't), short changes the union of money, AND sets a bad precedent for others IN the union to stop paying their dues, since hey, they still get the benefits, right? And then, next thing you know, the union has been broken. And the standing collective bargaining agreement goes with it
Because they had to...he was the president now. It doesn't mean they liked him though. But unions are for the middle class and wanted Trump to know that.
Because they had to...he was the president now. It doesn't mean they liked him though. But unions are for the middle class and wanted Trump to know that.
They swung to Trump before he was elected.
But yes, they are in many instances for the middle class, that is why they defected from the Obama/Clinton wing of the party.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
