Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
lol. In the name of honesty 1,000 rounds weighs about 27 lbs. So cutting that in half and adding magazine weight it still isn't that heavy. Enough to slow you down, but still not that heavy of a load.
Bandoliers and vest to carry it all? Or 1 AR in 1 hand and pockets full of mags head to toe and what's left over goes clamped under your other arm?
I wish they would just go ahead and ban the AR 15. We are wasting so much energy and attention over a stupid issue.
Remington can remake it in a different shape and color if they want and call it the PRR-80. Change the magazine size, maybe tweak the caliber, make the barrel half an inch longer. make it a pretty color. Rainbow or pink. No one would dare oppose a rainbow gun. Better yet call it the Happy Unicorn Rainbow Shooter (HURS - 15). Everyone will be happy. Then the hysteria will die down, people can feel like they have done something about the problem, and those with sense can focus on actually doing something about the real problem. People who want to kill everyone they know.
Gun rights people should not be bothered. It is not any more of a problem edging in in on gun rights than banning automatic rifles or bump stocks. Gun control advocates can feel like the won and they accomplished something.
So what? It will make no difference to anyone. Just get it done and quit wasting time and resources non this stupid issue. We need meaningful action on the real problem before this happens again. (Of course it will happen again and again and again, especially if we just keep trying to ban various weapons, tools and substances.
I'm down with that, it's what they did before. The banned HK got renamed the SAR 8 and off we go. It changed nothing but at least they shut up.
33 is hardly an arsenal so lets get that out of the way. I know collectors that have hundreds and most of them would be too dangerous to shoot they are so old.
I have a couple 22 revolvers like that. One was left to me by my late FIL.
lol. In the name of honesty 1,000 rounds weighs about 27 lbs. So cutting that in half and adding magazine weight it still isn't that heavy. Enough to slow you down, but still not that heavy of a load.
600 rounds loaded into magazines would be around 22 lbs.
You need to add a rifle that weighs 7.5 lbs, which brings the total to be around 30 lbs.
How could anybody with a rifle and 20 magazines strapped on him walk into a school unopposed?
You cant carry a gun and a backpack that weights 22 pounds? Not that hard. These kind of hindsight prognostications are always so dumb.
I mean, why didn't we just post 30 Marines at the entrance to stop him? WHERE WERE THE MARINES HUH?
Are your children more important than your money?
Try to walk in a bank like that unopposed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.